top of page

News & Insights

Filter items with label

Search by term

The Energy Futures Lab’s Grid Sandbox Innovation Platform  The evolving grid  In 2022 it’s easy to take the flip of a light switch for granted. For the most part, people are accustomed to a dependable grid, meaning the intricate systems that provide access to safe, uninterrupted, and affordable electricity are often obscured. But uninterrupted power isn’t a given; it’s the result of a careful balancing act that can be tipped off kilter by any number of different factors.  That the grid is subject to disruption is nothing new. For example, if you look at Calgary, Edmonton and Lethbridge in the late 1800s,  you’ll learn that these cities were the first major urban centres to provide electricity in Alberta. By the turn of the century, however, existing electricity systems were becoming strained by a steadily growing population. A population boom was all it took to tip the scales. Today, our electricity system is facing new disruptions, disruptions that must be addressed if uninterrupted access to safe and affordable power is to remain the norm. While population growth may be a factor in some regions, the rapid expansion of distributed energy resources (DERs) is quickly altering traditional electricity distribution.  DERs include a wide array of electricity-producing resources, such as solar panels, electric battery storage, electric vehicles and controllable loads like heat pumps, air conditioners and electric water heaters. DERs are significantly altering the way energy is produced and distributed, but to understand this disruption, it’s worth remembering how our traditional electricity system is set up. In the past, we’ve primarily followed a centralized model wherein electricity is produced at large generating stations, often near the loads they serve. The electricity is delivered to end users through transmission and distribution systems, enabling a clear relationship between customers’ energy consumption and the services delivered by utilities. Today, DER technologies can be built at smaller scales and can be co-located near the loads they serve. This also allows for the creation of microgrids, most simply defined as decentralized groups of energy resources. So instead of electricity being generated solely at large generating stations, it can instead be generated at smaller stations or even at people’s homes. This begs many questions. For example, what does it mean for customers who are now producing their own power using solar PVs, but who remain connected to the grid? How might we manage a strained electricity supply as electric vehicle (EV) adoption begins to skyrocket? Furthermore, how might utilities adapt their business models and relationships to customers as these systems continue to evolve? The bottom line is simple: as DERs continue to impact our existing electricity system, the delivery of utility services is becoming less straightforward. Furthermore, the current distribution system is overloaded, meaning that it cannot accommodate any more DERs without either massive upgrades to the grid or distributed energy resource management systems (DERMS). As one can imagine, new innovations are required, creating massive opportunities for Alberta. Distributed energy resources management systems (DERMS) are systems developed to manage grid loads as DERs continue to change the way electricity is produced and distributed. There is a growing market for electric utility software applications, allowing digital innovators such as those involved in the Energy Futures Lab’s Grid Sandbox Initiative to come forth with unique solutions. As an innovation space for artificial intelligence (AI) innovators, utilities and homeowners to seek solutions for electricity demand management, the Grid Sandbox Initiative is working to identify new ways for utilities and consumers to gather better data for decision makers today (in our current grid system) as well as for the future system, in a way that supports a clean, affordable and distributed electric energy system.  Leveraging digital innovation to create the energy system the future requires of us  The Grid Sandbox initiative was inspired by the following question: “how might we leverage digital innovation to create the energy system that the future requires of us?” With artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) beginning to play an even more integral role in shaping our evolving energy system, developing software applications using Alberta-led AI/ML offered a logical next step. In a proposal to the RBC Foundation, the project team described their idea. The concept involved creating “virtual neighborhoods” to act as a Grid Sandbox and was developed under the umbrella of the EFL’s Energy.AI initiative . The platform would group participating homeowners from across the province into at least three “virtual neighborhoods.” AI/ML innovators and utilities would also participate as solution providers by developing an interactive online platform featuring virtual DER technologies and/or communications aimed at changing homeowner behaviours.  The goal of this project is therefore to set up a virtual “data sandbox,” allowing participants to test new utility business models and energy services in a safe environment, but using real-world data in a way that benefits utilities and consumers alike. “The Grid Sandbox is unique because it allows you to pilot something in a virtual space while still engaging with real people and real utilities”  – Barend Dronkers, Project Lead for the Grid Sandbox initiative.  But what exactly does it mean for participants to “test new utility business models and energy services in a safe environment”? What might this look like for consumers? Or providers? An apt example, offered by the Grid Sandbox project team, draws connections between this work and the platform developed by major streaming giant, Netflix. Think of it this way. When a subscriber logs into Netflix to watch any given movie or TV show, Netflix gathers this data and in turn curates tailored suggestions for that specific viewer. New recommendations often highlight movies or shows that the viewer may never have known about, and that may have taken hours of scrolling or searches to eventually discover. In this sense, the consumer both saves time and learns about the suite of “products and services” offered by the company, while the company learns more about their customers’ preferences and behavioral patterns while also ensuring their “products and services” are recognized by the consumer as available options. Furthermore, AI algorithms developed as part of the Grid Sandbox would provide tailored recommendations not only about available products and services, but also about how the customers might change their behaviour to, for example, lower their overall energy consumption. With the delivery of utility services becoming less straightforward as a result of DERs, clear communication between utility providers and consumers can help both parties make more thoughtful decisions, while allowing for a better understanding of how DERs are changing the rules of the game. As Canada strives towards net-zero by midcentury, another direct benefit may be improved energy efficiency as the consumer becomes increasingly aware of incentives or programs aimed at reducing emissions. The Grid Sandbox platform provides an opportunity to capture and make sense of “behind the meter” data. For example, instead of simply understanding how much energy is being consumed, the project strives to help utilities gain insight into how efficient their consumers’ appliances or DERs are. This data, then, is something of a golden egg. Without it, the gap between what producers can offer and what their customers need or want may widen.  “How can we make policies for hitting climate targets in Edmonton if the incentives are based on poor data?” asks Barend Dronkers.  With available data, transforming the grid becomes all the more feasible. Furthermore, if producers are able to tap into their customers’ needs, a whole suite of benefits may be unleashed, including more knowledgeable and responsible “energy citizens.” The “Rules of the Game”  For a sandbox or “solutions space” to work, boundaries must be established. In other words, a framework is required. The Grid Sandbox project team sometimes refers to this framework as the “Rules of the Game,” a set of rules mimicking regulations imposed by the Alberta Utilities Commission within the confines of the Alberta Electric Utilities Act. In the same way that there are rules capping what a telecommunications company can charge on a monthly basis, there are rules regulating what utilities can charge and the kinds of activities they may engage in.  As the energy sector evolves, so too will the regulatory frameworks governing utilities. The question is how will they change?   Because the grid sandbox is ultimately a planning tool for utilities, the data they receive can help them make key decisions about what to incentivize and how to navigate a changing energy landscape. With live data, they can better understand the implications behind regulatory changes and shifting consumer preferences. The customers, which will eventually interface with the utilities through an app, are also given an opportunity to assess potential implications. If they adopt a DER such as solar, for example, they can gain further insight into how their energy bills might be affected.  All hands on deck: developing foundational partnerships  The importance of collaboration and partnerships in developing the Grid Sandbox cannot be overstated. In June 2020, the Energy Futures Lab and the City of Edmonton co-hosted a workshop focused on identifying the role of AI/ML in supporting the City’s of Edmonton Transition Strategy. Particular emphasis was placed on rising demand for electricity due to a greater adoption of DERs such as heat pumps and electric vehicles. In essence, workshop participants were exploring how to balance demand, while also avoiding a costly revamp of the city’s infrastructure. Digital innovation could help do both, but the challenge would still require a diversity of expertise to solve.   “No one party is going to own the solution,” explains Prageet Nibber, an EFL Fellow and CEO of ReWatt Power, a project partner. “The energy system is so complicated, meaning a bunch of different parties will all have to contribute their bit. The collaborative approach needed in this work is definitely aligned with the EFL’s convening strategy.”  As expert conveners, the Energy Futures Lab stepped in to support system-wide collaboration. As a result, the Grid Sandbox was born. The project quickly snowballed as new project partners were onboarded, beginning with Energy Efficiency Alberta (EEA) and the City of Edmonton, followed by ReWatt Power, Braintoy and ENMAX Power shortly thereafter.  While ReWatt Power, a dedicated climate accounting and monetization platform, has worn many hats within the Grid Sandbox, their expertise in data collection and building financial incentive programs has proven invaluable. Furthermore, as the Grid Sandbox will ultimately be distributed as a ReWatt product, the company will provide the code behind the final application. In particular, as utilities begin moving towards leveraging what metering can do, the ability to tap into “behind the meter” data (as ReWatt is doing) becomes particularly important. With increased access to data, utilities can begin building “homeowner profiles.” For example, a homeowner profile can show what the average profile of a homeowner might look like based on the type of home they live in, the number of people in the dwelling and the square footage of that particular building. But first, to create these homeowner profiles, data must be processed and with large volumes of incoming information, this could prove to be an exhaustive task. This is where Braintoy comes in, an AI/ML company who’s produced a machine learning platform called mlOS. Describing mlOS as a platform that “empowers developers, teams, and businesses to build, manage, and monitor models at scale,” their product emerged as a valuable asset in this data intensive project. By deploying machine learning to sort through the data, homeowner profiles can be designed more efficiently.  The data collection, meanwhile, serves to benefit utilities by providing them with insight into customers’ interests and behaviours. The project, then, would need to engage a utility to help test the platform, so in 2021, when Terri-Lynn Duque joined the Energy Futures Lab as a Fellow, she became an important liaison between the project team and ENMAX Power. Leveraging her position as the Director of Strategic Innovation with ENMAX Power, she became excited about the Grid Sandbox and worked to support the EFL in navigating a possible relationship with one of Alberta’s largest energy providers. While ENMAX Power is currently the only utility partnered  in the Grid Sandbox, ongoing discussions indicate future interest from other utilities in the province. The project is now in its first phase, with approximately ten ENMAX Power employees having signed on to create a “virtual neighborhood.”  RBC Tech for Nature Program  “RBC Tech for Nature is our multi-year commitment to preserving the world’s greatest wealth: our natural ecosystem. We work with partners to leverage technology and innovation capabilities to solve pressing environmental challenges.” Dedicated to funding technology-driven programs focused on data, the innovation ecosystem and communities of action, the RBC Tech for Nature Program helped to give birth to the Grid Sandbox Project within the Energy Futures Lab’s broader stream of work known as “ Energy.AI ”.  Moving Forward  Today, the Grid Sandbox initiative is well underway thanks in large part to the Energy Futures Lab. Playing an instrumental role in facilitating cross-sector relationship building, the EFL helped establish some key partnerships that have helped bring this work to fruition. References : http://www.history.alberta.ca/energyheritage/energy/electricity/the-early-history-of-electricity-in-alberta/default.aspx#page-1 https://www.ieso.ca/en/Learn/Ontario-Power-System/A-Smarter-Grid/Distributed-Energy-Resources #Electricity #Future_Economy #Clean_Technologies #Grid_Sandbox #DERMs #NonWires_Solutions #Rooftop_Solar #Batteries #2022 #Electric_Vehicles #Heat_Pumps

Impact: Leveraging digital innovation to power Alberta’s energy future

The Energy Futures Lab’s Grid Sandbox Innovation Platform  The evolving grid  In 2022 it’s easy to take the flip of a light switch for granted. For the most part, people are accustomed to a dependable grid, meaning the intricate systems that provide access to safe, uninterrupted, and affordable electricity are often obscured. But uninterrupted power isn’t a given; it’s the result of a careful balancing act that can be tipped off kilter by any number of different factors.  That the grid is...

Canada has the raw materials and commodities that the world is increasingly desperate for today, and the innovation capital to turn them into the future-fit energy that will be in demand for generations to come. ... Nobody ever said the energy transition would be easy, but few likely imagined it would be this chaotic. In retrospect, it was probably tempting to think that the transition to a low-emission economy could be a gentle and gradual affair. Well, so much for that. With energy security once again at the forefront of our minds, it’s time to consider what that really means. The current energy landscape has come a long way from the energy crises of the 1970s and 1980s. There are certainly parallels — geopolitical uncertainty, embargoes, reactive domestic policies — yet those events catalyzed a shift in the way energy was produced and used, propelling us to where we are today. We should learn from the past but keep looking ahead. While the race is still on, in recent years, rapid progress has been made towards a net-zero future. And if anything, it’s about to pick up speed — with Alberta and Canada well positioned to compete. Now’s not the time to take our hands off the wheel. Canada has the raw materials and commodities that the world is increasingly desperate for today, and the innovation capital to turn them into the future-fit energy that will be in demand for generations to come. Meanwhile, our country’s framework for reducing emissions and incentivizing companies who do it well gives us a global advantage. Now, we just need the resolve to combine those two things, while resisting the temptation to double down on business as usual. Past paths to finding energy security will likely differ from those needed now. The concept of energy security is going to mean something very different in the future, both here in Canada and around the world. It’s time to update our conception of energy security based on 21st century principles. It will be about developing net-zero energy sources that are closer to home, are both reliable and affordable, and more predictable in cost. It will take a thriving innovation ecosystem, resourced for long-term goals not just short-term needs. It will mean building value chains and supporting emerging industries and technology to capitalize on homegrown opportunities. It will take both clear policy signals and catalytic investments. And it can’t ignore the complexities between our social systems and our energy system. We have a role to play in supporting the energy security of our allies and peers, but if we hit the brakes on our own energy transition, it would only put us further behind in the race to net-zero. In the process, we would forgo emerging market opportunities that the energy transition presents; future-fit hydrocarbon markets that include commodities such as hydrogen, uses for bitumen beyond combustion, and the expanding demand for critical minerals and battery metals. Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson boldly stated “there is no energy transition without critical minerals, and this is why critical mineral supply chain resilience is an increasing priority for advanced economies.” With the federal government committing $3.8-billion towards the critical minerals strategy and the demand for electric vehicles surging, investment — if properly directed — can position Canada as a global competitor. In a recent report , the International Energy Agency highlights that minerals’ “rising importance in a decarbonizing energy system requires energy policy makers to expand their horizons and consider potential new vulnerabilities. Concerns about price volatility and security of supply do not disappear in an electrified, renewables-rich energy system.” With mounting concerns about global supply, Canadians could — and should — be manufacturing end products, such as batteries, for the electrified economy and building a secure, responsible, less carbon-intensive value chain. To truly grow this industry, however, Canada needs to move beyond its comfort zone. A future-fit hydrocarbon sector, including battery metals, will grow exponentially as opposed to the diminishing returns a business as usual approach will produce. But delaying investments in future-fit hydrocarbons  will only make them more expensive to build and deploy in the coming years and dwindle capacity to capture global market share. Now, more than ever, we need political and business leadership that’s willing to bet on the future instead of the past. What does that look like? It means finding solutions to the challenges of energy security, affordability, and climate change at the same time rather than pitting them against each other. Recognizing that standalone solutions won’t provide energy security, it means supporting a thriving technological and social innovation ecosystem to get us there. Above all, it means making brave and bold bets on the transformative technologies and ideas that will define the economy of the future. On this one, slow and steady will not win the race. First published in Hill Times  Aug 11, 2022 Alison Cretney  is the managing director of the Energy Futures Lab , an Alberta-based coalition of diverse innovators and leading organizations working to accelerate the transition to a more sustainable, prosperous, and inclusive energy future. #2022 #Regional_Pathways #Clean_Technologies #Battery_Metals_Vision_and_Roadmap #Batteries #Lithium_from_Brine #Electric_Vehicles #Radical_Middle #Fellowship #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #FutureFit_Hydrocarbons

There’s no energy security without net zero

Canada has the raw materials and commodities that the world is increasingly desperate for today, and the innovation capital to turn them into the future-fit energy that will be in demand for generations to come. ... Nobody ever said the energy transition would be easy, but few likely imagined it would be this chaotic. In retrospect, it was probably tempting to think that the transition to a low-emission economy could be a gentle and gradual affair. Well, so much for that. With energy security...

The Energy Futures Lab contributes to a growing battery metals industry The EV Revolution Every so often, humans stumble upon a resource that accelerates our progress in unimaginable ways. With the discovery of fire, we learned to illuminate the world around us, unearthing countless new opportunities. We learned to harness the wind and the sun, we made something of bitumen and natural gas. Each of these discoveries allowed us to move forward in leaps and bounds. But at the heart of progress lies an important reminder: the planet and those who inhabit it are ever-evolving. We continue to adapt in the face of new challenges, such as those emerging as a result of climate change. In recent years, rising greenhouse gas emissions have pushed us towards electrification at an unprecedented rate, inspiring us to diversify our relationships with a wide array of natural resources. In today’s world, lithium has emerged as a critical resource that will once again change the course of human history. The discovery of lithium (the lightest metal on the periodic table) isn’t new, but our relationship with lithium is quickly changing. Scientists began working on lithium-ion batteries in the 1970s, but it wasn’t until 1991 that the first commercial lithium-ion battery hit the market. Fast-forward thirty years and batteries are set to play an integral role in the transition to net-zero by midcentury. Thanks to a myriad of factors, including improved battery technology, policy support and a wider availability of charging infrastructure, electric vehicle (EV) sales are surging. In fact, EV sales rose by 43% in 2020. Consider the fact that overall vehicle sales dropped due to the global Covid-19 pandemic and this figure becomes all the more impressive. While lithium has made quite the splash as a poster child for battery technologies, there are many other critical metals and minerals required to support the transition and build out a domestic supply chain. In fact, the World Bank Group estimates “that over 3 billion tons of minerals and metals will be needed to deploy wind, solar and geothermal power, as well as energy storage, required for achieving a below 2°C future.” Making sense of the complexities within our changing energy system, however, as well as the opportunities and challenges therein, is no easy task, but it was one the Energy Futures Lab came to embrace with curiosity and commitment. Thus, the story of the Energy Futures Lab’s contribution to an emerging battery metals sector is ultimately a story that speaks to the power of collaboration and social innovation. Lithium and a Unique Alberta Opportunity In Alberta, where the  Energy Futures Lab (the Lab)  anchors much of its work, lithium-rich brines exist in the Devonian formations around Fox Creek, Leduc and Swan Hills. In 2017, few people knew about this untapped opportunity. It took individuals like Liz Lappin, who joined the Lab as a Fellow in February of 2017, to help spread the word. Liz was well aware of Alberta’s potential and eager to share these opportunities with the rest of the Lab’s Fellowship. She joined  E3 Lithium  (E3) during their start-up phase and proposed the launch of a collaborative initiative with the Lab to develop a lithium project in Alberta. An elegant solution to a long-standing challenge, E3 demonstrated how Alberta could lean on its existing oil and gas infrastructure to support the creation of a globally-competitive lithium industry. As “a lithium resource and technology company working towards the production of lithium products to power the growing electrical revolution,” E3 was looking for opportunities to build awareness and with Liz as a Fellow, E3 was granted a unique opportunity to connect into Alberta’s innovation ecosystem. Since Canada’s reserves already include many of the raw materials required for lithium-ion batteries, such as graphite, cobalt, nickel and sulphur, the country is well positioned to contribute to this rapidly expanding market as a stable and secure source of low greenhouse gas raw materials. But as E3 pointed out, Alberta has more to offer than just energy. For example, many of Alberta’s oil and gas wells produce saline waters “dusted” with lithium. With concentrations between 50 and 140 parts per million, this source of lithium is low compared to global sources. In Alberta, this lithium was discovered thanks to existing infrastructure built by the province’s long-established oil and gas industry, thereby saving lithium companies millions of dollars in exploration costs. “It [the lithium ion battery supply chain] will be built on the backbone of oil and gas, putting Albertans back to work and revitalizing legacy infrastructure,” a team of Energy Futures Lab Fellows described in an original project brief. “Lithium is just one example of a natural resource that can be added to Alberta’s energy mix to boost our resilience.” “This is more than just about coming together. It’s about coming together with a purpose.” — Pong Leung, Energy Futures Lab Senior Advisor Wanting to build upon the Fellowship’s keen interest in E3’s work, the Energy Futures Lab began exploring how it could support these endeavors while simultaneously acknowledging that its role in the system was not as a start-up incubator. Instead, the Lab sought to support the industry more broadly. Through conversation and collaboration, they came to see an even bigger opportunity. Rather than support individual companies’ business development goals, the Energy Futures Lab would support this budding industry by bringing together key players from across the system, thereby tapping into the power of diverse expertise and perspectives, helping to establish credibility, weaving together a compelling narrative and demonstrating how a battery metals supply chain could contribute to an evolving energy system. “[The] whole idea of lithium, the development of a lithium industry from oilfield wastewater, [is] a great example of what the lab was all about, in the sense of leveraging our existing assets from our legacy energy industry to set ourselves up for success in the future energy industry.” — Chad Park, Energy Futures Lab Founding Director Growing the Lithium Industry With time, it became clear that the Fellows alone could not steward this work. Players from across the value chain needed to join the conversation, so in November of 2018, the Energy Futures Lab hosted an accelerator workshop, Mobility in a Low-Carbon Future , to help advance these efforts. E-mobility was becoming a hot topic, defined by numerous streams of work connected into a highly complex and evolving system. As such, the 2018 workshop was multifaceted and worked to accelerate several Lab initiatives, including Lithium on Tap. Liz, alongside collaborators such as Amanda Hall, presented on the opportunity for Alberta to grow its own lithium industry, thereby capturing participants’ interest and imagination. The notion that this opportunity was bigger than any individual player became all the more clear during the workshop when the group coalesced around the idea “Energy Storage Association Creation in EFL” on a yellow sticky note under “Most Important + Needed Next Actions.” This signaled a significant challenge: as a nascent industry, there was an increased need for stakeholder engagement to support the creation of partnerships across the supply chain as well as a stronger, more united industry voice. In essence, attendees identified the need for a new industry association. Under “Strategic Partnerships,” they scribbled on pink sticky notes, highlighting other key players whose voices would need to contribute to the development of an Alberta lithium industry. These partnerships included mid to junior oil and gas companies, EV manufacturers, chemical companies, upstream partners and more. The hope was that by establishing an industry association home to such diverse players, the lithium industry could improve its credibility and attract investment. What came out of this workshop ultimately laid the foundation for the creation of the Canadian Lithium Association. “One of the things that I heard from a lot of people — not just in the lab, outside of the lab as well — was, you need to start an industry association; nobody knows about lithium, nobody knows that there’s so much in Alberta; that we have this big opportunity. You need to start something that helps you with amplifying that as a larger opportunity.” — Liz Lappin, Energy Futures Lab Fellow The Canadian Lithium Association was founded by three companies: E3 Lithium, Prism Diversified and LiEP Energy. Together, these then junior lithium developers focused primarily on addressing the industry’s immediate needs. At the time, Liz sensed a tension emerging between the work of the Lab, which focused on the broader opportunity, and the work of this newly established industry association. “Our attention was focused on the major pressing issues,” she explained, reflecting on how members came together to discuss a number of shared challenges. A long-term vision would become important, but first, there was an even more immediate need to explore significant issues facing the lithium industry, such as regulatory barriers, a lack of public awareness, technological challenges or the inability to build out necessary infrastructure at a fast enough pace. In 2019 the idea of looking beyond lithium, to the broader battery market, began to crystalize and gain momentum. Jeff Bell, another of the Lab’s Fellows working for Alberta Economic Development and Trade, championed the industry, while simultaneously recognizing that lithium could be integrated into this broader value chain. With strong connections, Jeff played a critical role in bringing together key stakeholders from across the broader battery metals supply chain as part of a 2019 workshop: Alberta’s lithium-ion battery supply chain opportunities workshop . The workshop was the result of the collaboration and leadership of a number of Fellows who participated in both its design and delivery. “This is an opportunity for the province. Every time I had a chance, I’d be like, ‘we should be thinking about battery metals,’ because that’s where the world’s going and we can play in that space.” — Jeff Bell, Energy Futures Lab Fellow Capturing the Canadian Battery Metals Opportunity In 2020, around the time that the pandemic hit, the Canadian Lithium Association underwent some leadership changes. The idea of expanding the association to include the broader battery metals supply chain had been steeping since the 2019 workshop, and with the Canadian Lithium Association evolving, it became the perfect time to launch a rebrand. The foundation was laid for the Battery Metals Association of Canada (BMAC) , which would ultimately allow for greater collaboration across a growing sector. During this growth period, the Energy Futures Lab’s direct involvement waned, but its commitment to supporting the battery metals industry remained strong. While Fellows including Liz and Matt Beck worked with other BMAC board members off the sides of their desks to grow BMAC, the Energy Futures Lab continued to demonstrate its support through amplification and thoughtful storytelling. While much has changed in recent years, common anxieties and assumptions pervaded many of the early narratives defining the sector, including a fear that this new industry would threaten oil and gas, leading to lost jobs and economic instability. The Lab defied these assumptions, instead showcasing the numerous ways in which our “legacy assets’’ could be leveraged by drawing on existing workers, infrastructure and resources to enable the transition to a low-carbon economy. “That’s really important framing overall, because it helps avoid the us-against-them kind of framing: … clean energy versus dirty fossil fuels kind of thing. And that doesn’t really get us anywhere” — Chad Park, Energy Futures Lab Founding Director Through publications including Five Big Ideas for Alberta’s Economic Recovery  written by the Energy Futures Lab founding director, Chad Park and current Managing Director, Alison Cretney, as well as Alison and Liz’s article on  How Alberta’s lithium-laced oil fields can fuel the electric vehicle revolution , the Lab helped legitimize the industry’s potential, integrating lithium into a “suite of energy transition solutions’’ that spoke to the interconnected potential for Alberta to both thrive and lead in the transition. With time and coordination, the Battery Metals Association of Canada found its footing, built on many of the learnings and connections arising from the Lab’s convening. As a national non-profit association, the Battery Metals Association of Canada connects industry players from across the supply chain and aims to ensure Canada “fully captures the abundant economic potential of its massive resources through the responsible and sustainable growth of Canada’s battery metals supply chain.” Bringing together industry leaders from across a broad, growing and new supply chain brings forth both opportunities and challenges. As a diversity of expertise and perspectives found space to collide, the need for a “unified industry voice” became all the more apparent. Without alignment, progress would be stalled. While it remains important for these key players to bring forth their own unique understandings of the industry, a shared vision would establish some common ground to allow an otherwise diverse group of leaders to advance and accelerate the industry’s growth. In the winter of 2020, Wendy Ell, who at the time was a Fellow joining from JWN Energy, helped get the ball rolling by assisting BMAC in securing sponsorship for a grant from Western Economic Development. The funds would be used to support the Lab’s work with BMAC, including workshops in 2021. By this point, the Energy Futures Lab had re-emerged as an important partner in this work, supporting BMAC in convening the industry to develop a shared vision. In October 2021, the Lab hosted a series of workshops to explore “A Bold, Transformative Vision for the Industry.” As a result of these collaborative sessions, BMAC landed a  shared vision , allowing its members to begin moving forward together. In early 2022, they hosted another series of workshops, Building a National Battery Strategy, in which participants worked together to create a roadmap for the battery metals sector. “The EFL has played a major role in supporting BMAC to meet the needs of this emerging sector. We couldn’t have done this work at the pace we have without the Lab’s support.” — Liz Lappin, Energy Futures Lab Fellow While there is still much work to be done, the last five years have resulted in incredible progress. The Energy Futures Lab continues to champion this emerging industry, while bringing together a diversity of perspectives to explore how Alberta can leverage its assets to thrive in a net-zero future. Roadmap to Success In 2020, when Bentley Allan, currently a Fellow with the Transition Accelerator, and Stewart Elgie from the Smart Prosperity Institute participated in a workshop together, they quickly found themselves speaking the same language. Their shared vision and interest in Canada’s battery metals supply chain led them to scope out a new and collaborative roadmapping project, later coined Canada’s Future in a Net-Zero World . To Bentley, a roadmap provides the foundation for a national strategy, so their work together focused on identifying key stepping stones that could help guide Canada in creating a successful battery metals industry. Meanwhile, David Hughes, CEO of The Natural Step Canada, introduced Bentley to the Energy Futures Lab’s Managing Director, Alison Cretney. Shortly after, Bentley was invited to share his work to the Lab team in the fall of 2021. His talk was very well received, and as a result, Bentley was invited to offer a talk to the Creating a Bold Transformative Vision for Canada’s Battery Metals Industry workshop series hosted by BMAC and the Energy Futures Lab in October. “Usually I’ll receive one email and a few LinkedIn connections after my talks,” Bentley explained, “but this time, I received five emails from members of the audience and I thought ‘Oh that really struck a nerve with that particular audience.’” When he reached out to one participant asking for 30 minutes of their time, he was instead met by a strikingly positive and enthusiastic response. You can have 300 minutes if you need, they wrote , a response which arguably encapsulates the passion and buy-in from a wide range of industry leaders. In part, Bentley’s talk at the BMAC workshop resonated with the audience because BMAC had already identified the need for a federal strategy. In this sense, many of the workshop’s participants were already bought into Bentley’s roadmapping efforts on a conceptual level, and they viewed this work as a critical next step in establishing the industry’s supply chain. By the end of the first workshop series, BMAC had developed a shared vision. While this was indeed a step worth celebrating, bringing the vision to life would involve a lot of rigorous work. So when Bentley, along with the Lab’s Juli Rohl and Pong Leung, approached Liz Lappin and described an opportunity to backcast from the recently created vision, the foundation was laid for yet another set of workshops to be hosted in January. “The industry’s top level leadership was engaged and understood the need for a federal strategy” — Bentley Allen. Between fall of 2021 and January, work moved quickly. Bentley began meeting with technical experts, mostly CTOs and CEOs, to develop a working version of the roadmap, meanwhile, Juli and Pong focused on laying the groundwork for the second workshop series titled Goals and Priority Actions and Going Forward Together. Everyone was working on a short timeline, which was unusual as this kind of roadmapping exercise would typically take upwards of four or five months to complete. These efforts, however, were tremendously accelerated by a desire to engage the Government of Canada in early 2022 to inform mandate letters and the Federal budget. So by January, Bentley had managed to craft a “straw dog” of sorts, which he shared with workshop participants who helped refine and assess the roadmap. “There’s a huge demand for this work,” Bentley said, which reinforced the team’s desire to speak with both leaders at the federal and provincial levels. The roadmap, which will be delivered in the form of a report, is therefore a timely contribution to a growing industry. Driving Forward By bringing together diverse players in the industry, the Energy Futures Lab was able to facilitate conversations and connections which played an important role in the genesis of what evolved to be the Battery Metals Association of Canada. In the spirit of collaboration, BMAC and the Energy Futures Lab believe that through cross-sectoral efforts, Canada can capture significant value along the entire electric vehicle supply chain. Through a series of workshops the seeds of a pan-Canadian approach were sown, the fruits of which are now being materialized in the development of a national strategy to capitalize on regional strengths and align industries. There is a compelling value proposition for the battery metals industry that integrates seamlessly into existing Canadian markets with a growing value-chain industry  ecosystem  already in place, and efforts are underway to ensure that battery metals will be “ a significant contributor to Canada’s prosperity and the global energy transition” as per BMAC’s shared vision. Sources : Reddy, Mogalahalli V et al. “ Brief History of Early Lithium-Battery Development. ” Materials (Basel, Switzerland)  vol. 13,8 1884. 17 Apr. 2020, doi:10.3390/ma13081884 World Bank. Climate-Smart Mining: Minerals for Climate Action , 2020, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank.Alberta Energy Regulator. Critical Minerals in Alberta Brown, Michael. U of A spinoff company could help unlock a lithium industry for Alberta . University of Alberta Folio, 25 May 2021. #2022 #Regional_Pathways #Clean_Technologies #Battery_Metals_Vision_and_Roadmap #Batteries #Lithium_from_Brine #Electric_Vehicles #Radical_Middle #Fellowship

From Lithium on Tap to the Battery Metals Association of Canada

The Energy Futures Lab contributes to a growing battery metals industry The EV Revolution Every so often, humans stumble upon a resource that accelerates our progress in unimaginable ways. With the discovery of fire, we learned to illuminate the world around us, unearthing countless new opportunities. We learned to harness the wind and the sun, we made something of bitumen and natural gas. Each of these discoveries allowed us to move forward in leaps and bounds. But at the heart of progress...

By Guest Contributor Matthew Rygus   Gathered together at the beautiful Ampersand building in downtown Calgary, attendees at the Energy Futures Lab 2022 Youth Innovation Jam devoted an entire Saturday to the energy transition. With the intention of driving equitable and sustainable solutions for our world’s energy issues, the event started off on a passionate note with a speech that literally brought tears to eyes. It set the tone for the rest of the event, making it clear that the attendees were there to do more than simply discuss energy issues and possible solutions. They were there to collaborate for real change; to uproot current ways of doing in a manner that prioritizes inclusivity and sustainability. “The day was filled with passion, energy and growth. Three themes that speak to the event itself, every one of its attendees, and act as the very keys to realizing an inclusive energy transition in our lifetime.” – Matthew Rygus Fueled by scientific truths and morally grounded aims, the attendees of various backgrounds participated in activities that enhanced everyone’s knowledge and capacities to drive such change. From the panel of veteran industry professionals and entrepreneurs who provided both inspiring stories and pragmatic tips on leading change, to the many discussions led by Indigenous attendees on the value and methods of including Indigenous perspectives, to the innovation sessions where project developers acquired precious ideas that would help advance/enhance their endeavours related to the energy transition. The day was filled with passion, energy and growth. Three themes that speak to the event itself, every one of its attendees, and act as the very keys to realizing an inclusive energy transition in our lifetime. Acting as more than just a day to show awareness, the 2022 Youth Innovation Jam set a clearer path forward for attendees and anyone else willing to help with the energy transition. We need continuous collaboration, consistent empathy, and a strong mix of knowledge with perseverance to take actions that will support this transition. And from these actions we need to influence and inspire ever more people to join the movement, until it becomes the new status quo for a world in desperate need of adjustment in the Anthropocene. With the end of this innovation jam comes the beginning of a renewed sense of direction. All that’s left is for us to carry the torch forward, ensuring that its handle is touched by anyone and everyone who has a stake in energy on Earth. Matthew Rygus is a Sustainability Analyst and Project Coordinator who is currently completing a Master’s in Sustainability Management. Outside of these ventures, he is an avid creative writer (currently working on a screenplay while continuously writing original songs) and a hiker.  #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Clean_Technologies #Youth_Innovation_Jam #2022 #Radical_Middle #EFL_Platform #EFL_Vision

Intergenerational Inspiration at the Youth Innovation Jam

By Guest Contributor Matthew Rygus   Gathered together at the beautiful Ampersand building in downtown Calgary, attendees at the Energy Futures Lab 2022 Youth Innovation Jam devoted an entire Saturday to the energy transition. With the intention of driving equitable and sustainable solutions for our world’s energy issues, the event started off on a passionate note with a speech that literally brought tears to eyes. It set the tone for the rest of the event, making it clear that the attendees...

How can Alberta’s economy continue to attract investment in a net-zero future? Over the last year, great minds in finance, policy, advocacy, and systems change have come together through the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative to answer this question, and Smart Prosperity Institute has been both a participant and an advisor on the process. One key finding has been that decades of extracting oil and gas has given Alberta the tools to excel in other sectors, if the right policies are put in place. Alberta’s hydrocarbon industry has developed a host of companies specialized in supporting all aspects of oil and gas extraction, processing, transportation and refining whose skill sets and assets combine to form an  economic cluster . Clusters are made up of groups of companies and institutions located in a given region, and they are often drivers of innovation and prosperity. History tells us that clusters can take on a life of their own and even renew themselves after the original industry declines. This blog explains what clusters are and what this lens can tell us about Alberta’s economic prospects in a net-zero future, summarizing a recent brief on economic clusters by Smart Prosperity Institute that was authored by Aline Coutinho, Una Jefferson and Mike Moffatt. What is an economic cluster? Clusters are groupings of companies, institutions and infrastructure that emerge in a given region around a particular economic opportunity. What separates a cluster from an industry is that the players in the space are located close to one another, and are deeply interlinked; they depend on each other for different aspects of their businesses, and often operate at different stages of the same value-chain. This proximity and interconnectedness means that rates of information sharing, idea combination and knowledge transfer are higher within the cluster than outside of it, which is part of the appeal of clusters: Companies within a cluster have easier, or low-cost, access to other companies and information that improve their business, making the cluster a more attractive place for companies in that industry to operate. The region in which a given cluster occurs can vary in size, but it is always defined by a place. Silicon Valley in California, the Pearl River Delta Economic Zone in Southeastern China, North Italy’s shoe manufacturing hub, Hamilton, Ontario’s health technology research centre, and Taiwan’s semiconductor/ITC sector are all examples of successful clusters, which have also been referred to as “business hubs”. Alberta’s hydrocarbon sector can be thought of as a cluster because it meets this definition nicely: Within the province, there are a host of companies, institutions and organizations that support oil and gas extraction, refining and processing directly and indirectly whose success depends on both themselves and others. These include a range of manufacturers and engineering, legal, financial, project management, and environmental services, many of whom have specialized knowledge, and who play a critical role in the overall oil and gas industry. What does thinking about Alberta’s energy sector as a cluster offer? Policy should have an aim of supporting both companies creating jobs today, and the growth and emergence of companies who will create jobs for tomorrow’s workforce. Thinking about Alberta’s hydrocarbon sector as a cluster can help with these objectives in three ways: One, using a cluster lens shows that there is a clear role for policy to support the  building blocks  firms need to develop and thrive, including capital, a skilled workforce, a supportive regulatory environment, IP protections and access to new markets, to name a few — necessary for firms to develop and thrive. Two, the cluster lens illustrates that there is a need for more than a handful of companies to drive forward the future of Alberta’s energy sector. The presence of companies engaged in specialized niches in a given value chain makes it more attractive for newcomers to set up shop in the region, and can create a sector that attracts new companies because of its inherent advantages. Three, a clusters lens can offer useful lessons to policymakers about how success has been achieved elsewhere, especially in regions or environments where large industries have faced uncertain economic futures. Clusters are more than capable of reinvention, but their success in pivoting towards future opportunities is never guaranteed. The revitalization of a cluster, which can occur either before or after a decline starts, can occur in  three different ways : A cluster can adopt frameworks and approaches from elsewhere slowly, and integrate them over time (“Adaptation”); A cluster can suddenly adopt new technologies that open up new markets immediately (“Renewal”); A cluster can take its existing internal skill sets and products and develop its own innovations to drive future growth (“Transformation”). The ultimate path a cluster takes to support revitalization will depend due to a number of factors, many of them internal to a particular cluster, which include: The ability of companies, institutions and groups within the cluster to absorb, adopt, adapt and use external knowledge; The ability of companies to move around within the cluster, either geographically or within the value-chain; The similarity between new and old technologies adopted; and, The dynamics and relationships between the companies and institutions within the cluster itself. There are other factors as well, detailed in the policy brief, that influence whether a given cluster can revitalize itself using any of the three methods outlined above. What lessons learned from other clusters help identify policies suited to help Alberta’s hydrocarbon cluster moving forward? Clusters around the world offer a number of lessons that could be useful in helping the province navigate this period of economic change. While the policy brief details a number of lessons, here are three points worth sharing now: two points about best practices, and one important caveat. Governments have a role to play in promoting change when clusters start to enter decline:   One of the most famous clusters is California’s Silicon Valley, where a risk-tolerant culture was paired with major investment in the building blocks that companies and their workers need to engage in the kinds of entrepreneurial activities that create jobs. To promote the growth of new companies, governments need to support reskilling and retraining, investment in affordable housing and transportation solutions, and ensure that the data needed to run modern businesses can be accessed. These policies and supports can help to create an environment where taking risks does not lead to bankruptcy for innovators. Companies working close to each other need to learn from one another:  The Norwegian Centre for Excellence, a program aimed at supporting clusters in Norway, developed a program to try and help its companies learn from international examples by linking them into global value chains. Overall, the success of the program was modest and short-term, since it was not aligned with the sources of competitive advantage that clusters rely on to survive: interconnection and collaboration among the companies who are in geographic proximity within the cluster itself. Without these connections, local innovation does not thrive as readily, and it is difficult for clusters to remain competitive over time. Supporting technologies alone is not enough to create regional economic success stories:  Northern Sweden’s forestry cluster was once supported by a government program to grow its biorefinery and biogas sectors. The program offered support for companies to use new technologies and enter new value chains, in an effort to support renewal and adaptation in a high-employment cluster. However, even though governments supported technologies, other factors inhibited their uptake, including low levels of tolerance for disruption, lock-in to old production methods where capital had been invested, and markets that were not yet large enough to prove attractive. For policies that support clusters to succeed, they need to offer support that address the actual challenges companies face and the concerns they have, beyond simply offering support for the specific technologies governments would like to see adopted. Building something from something Thinking about Alberta’s hydrocarbon sector as a cluster highlights the wealth of assets that have grown up around oil and gas extraction, including infrastructure, skills, intellectual property, supply chains, and social capital. Policymakers should learn from past instances of cluster renewal to ensure that these assets are leveraged towards a prosperous net-zero future in Alberta in a way that leverages the province’s strengths, and allows it to set the course for its own future. John McNally is a Senior Research Associate and the Manager of the Clean Growth team at the Smart Prosperity Institute. He is a member of the working group for the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative. #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Regional_Pathways #Workforce_Readiness #Youth_Innovation_Jam #2022 #Radical_Middle #EFL_Platform #EFL_Vision

Working with what we have got: Why economic clusters are a useful frame for thinking about Alberta’s energy transition

How can Alberta’s economy continue to attract investment in a net-zero future? Over the last year, great minds in finance, policy, advocacy, and systems change have come together through the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative to answer this question, and Smart Prosperity Institute has been both a participant and an advisor on the process. One key finding has been that decades of extracting oil and gas has given Alberta the tools to excel in other sectors, if the right policies are put in...

Innovators . Entrepreneurial. Ambitious. This is how Albertans have long described themselves, a story often centred around our successful development of the oil sands, Alberta’s most consequential bet. But now the province is faced with a difficult question to reconcile: is this who we are or just who we were? This question will be answered one way or the other, whether we respond to it directly or not. Quite simply, some forces are bigger than Alberta. The question we should be asking ourselves is, do we want to dictate our future, or have our future dictated to us. Climate change and the global focus on emissions and sustainability is one of those forces. The recent  UN Climate Change Conference  (“COP ‘26”), where delegates from all over the world came to set a path of action to decrease emissions, serves as just one reminder. While Alberta doesn’t get to decide whether or how other jurisdictions, investors, or consumers move forward, we  do  get to decide how we respond. Are we the innovators and problem-solvers we claim we are, ready to lean into the next great challenge or are we spectators in a game we would prefer not to play? To be sure, there is and has been great work taking place across Alberta on climate action, especially in the traditional energy industry. The oil and gas industry has made major headway to decrease its emissions intensity; it is the largest investor of clean technology in Canada and has built the world’s largest Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (“CCUS”) transportation network which, in essence, captures harmful carbon emissions and safely transports and stores them to limit their consequences. While this is important and essential work, there is a much bigger opportunity on the horizon for Alberta. The global challenge Decreasing emissions quickly enough to stave off the most harmful effects of climate change will require reducing emissions from activities that produce them (e.g. driving a car; heating our homes; producing energy; and raising cattle)–an enormous challenge, of which few truly appreciate the scope and complexity–as well as direct air capture, which involves removing emissions from the atmosphere (like a giant air filter). This latter strategy, sometimes called “negative emissions”, is considered increasingly central to beating the clock, yet little progress has been made to enable it in a way that is scalable or cost-effective enough to move the dial. As  The Economist  recently noted, “If negative emissions are to play a role in policy, much more needs to be done to make them practically achievable.” As they put it, emissions removal technologies remain “at best, embryonic.” The opportunity for Alberta Now is the time for Alberta to be very Albertan once again. We need to take bold steps to solve the world’s most pressing challenge–the need for food, goods, and energy on a planet that cannot withstand the emissions currently associated with them. We could easily rationalize our way out of it– the risk, the cost, the unknown. Or, we can recognize the possibility of leading the charge to transform the irrational into the practical. What is often forgotten in retelling the story of Alberta’s oil sands is how ridiculous the idea sounded at the time–and the staunch opposition to the project received from many. First it was thought impossible, then cost-prohibitive, and now oil sands production is not only feasible, but offers some of the only oil on earth with a path to net-zero. A similar story could prove true for negative emissions. Revolutionary ideas rarely sound practical. Burt Rutan said, “Revolutionary ideas come from nonsense. If an idea is truly a breakthrough, then the day before it was discovered, it must have been considered crazy or nonsense or both–otherwise it wouldn’t be a breakthrough”. Developing the oil sands was the epitome of revolutionary nonsense: “ a daring venture into an unknown field ”, a field which at the time could have been described as “embryonic”. This time, Alberta is not starting from square one. We already have the experience and agility to become competitive in negative emissions technologies: familiarity and use of existing technologies like CCUS, individuals with deep knowledge of energy, emissions, and clean tech, as well as vast amounts of land for carbon storage and a strong underlying incentive–an abundance of valuable hydrocarbon resources to tap into in new ways that limit emissions. In fact, many oil and gas facilities today already employ a version of emissions reduction technology on a smaller scale. To tackle the global challenge, and enact real, world-changing progress on negative emissions technologies, we’ll require a full-systems, all-of-the-above, approach. As such, this is far bigger than any individual business or even industry. This is about building a province-wide culture, and the policy framework, required to propel breakthrough change in this space. A big idea So what exactly could this look like? One “big idea” that would match the spirit of this ambition: Alberta could become the global centre for excellence for negative emissions technologies, processes, and tracking and authentication, carving our own path so that while the world focuses on net-zero (i.e. remaining emissions are “cancelled out” by emissions removal), Alberta sets its sights on enabling net-negative (where remaining emissions are  more than  cancelled out by emissions removal). This could be game changing for the discussion around our natural resources as well. This big idea–or “moonshot”–would both signal to the world Alberta’s investment in the broader economic transformation taking place, and establish the province as a leader within it. Furthermore, policies that drive not just fewer emissions but net-negative emissions opens up a differentiating factor for Alberta as a destination for energy investment. This would anchor Alberta at the heart of Canada’s “living lab” for the next wave of technological advancement. What it will take While good policy will be essential, equally so will be our willingness, as a province, to be a little “nonsensical.” To define ourselves as entrepreneurs means we must embrace the other side of the coin–the discomfort, grit, and failure–required to make a crazy idea into a no-brainer solution. The first and most essential component of progress is to create the environment–physical spaces, political norms, and the ambitious spirit–necessary for big ideas to be raised, collaboration to be commonplace, and an endless loop of trial-and-error to be accepted. It is about making space for the big, bold, and risky–that very foundation upon which Alberta was, in many ways, built and defined. Second is speed. Building and improving upon negative emissions technologies should be tackled with the urgency of an election cycle but with the foresight of future generations. The clock is ticking. Ultimately, Alberta should be the place where nonsense ideas are made into reality so often that it becomes a part of the fabric of who we are as Albertans. Perhaps with this, ,when we look back one day on previous breakthroughs, we will have once again forgotten how crazy any of these big ideas once were. Alicia Planincic is an Economist at the Business Council of Alberta. She plays a crucial role in policy research and advocacy to make Alberta a better place. She brings experience in data analytics, a passion for effective prose, and a fresh perspective of economics. #Future_Economy #Regional_Pathways #Clean_Technologies #Culture_Shift #CCUS #International_Policy #Emissions_Removal_Technologies #2021

Alberta’s future: turning nonsense to common sense

Innovators . Entrepreneurial. Ambitious. This is how Albertans have long described themselves, a story often centred around our successful development of the oil sands, Alberta’s most consequential bet. But now the province is faced with a difficult question to reconcile: is this who we are or just who we were? This question will be answered one way or the other, whether we respond to it directly or not. Quite simply, some forces are bigger than Alberta. The question we should be asking...

As members of the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative, we spend a lot of time thinking about the future (it’s right in the name!). One way of thinking about policy is as a stated direction for how we might collectively  be  in the future, alongside the boundaries and incentives that we think might help us get there. To carve out a successful path using policy, we try to imagine and understand what pitfalls and opportunities might be just over the horizon. To help us figure that out, we use models: technological adoption models, climate models, energy system models. Of course, that’s easier said than done. The last 18 months of pandemic policy-making have been a powerful lesson in both the fallibility of models and the challenges of interpreting them correctly and acting. Does that mean we should consign models and modelling to the waste bin? No! But we need to be thoughtful about the kinds of models we’re embracing and how we use them. First, it’s important to differentiate between two kinds of models at play in the climate and energy space. Most commonly when people think of models, they think of predictive models. These are models that aim to predict the trajectory of a set of factors. Typically, predictive models work better with physical systems (like the rolling of a ball down a hill, or the operation of a machine) than they do with sociotechnical systems. Given what we know about the inputs, outputs, and processes related to global climate, as well as the variety and robustness of the modelling that has evolved around it, we can feel fairly confident about the predictive quality of climate models. Energy system modelling, on the other hand, is much more closely bound up in a myriad of (often irrational) human decisions, from consumer behaviour to political movements to the decisions of financial elites. Some energy system modellers opt to look at the rate of tech adoption and improvement as the solution here. However, change in the technology space may not be linear: technologies may lurk beneath the surface for years before sudden changes in their affordability or uptake. For many technologies, the shape of the graph is a longer period of time in plateau, then sudden inflection points. Solar and wind are a great example here, where the rate of cost decline outstripped the consensus predictions; on the inverse, the decline of coal has outstripped predictions. How do we make sense of this unpredictability? Here’s where our other kind of model comes in: scenario modelling. Rather than attempt to predict the unpredictable, we instead look to models for a range of possible futures, or scenarios. Smart scenario work covers a wide range, including outlier, unlikely scenarios as well as a set of more-likely possibilities. There are two watch-outs we need to be careful to avoid. First, there’s a human cognitive short-cut that encourages us to assume that things will continue in the way that they have before, what we might call our “business as usual” scenario. It’s a common short-cut because it’s often the case! However, while business-as-usual is a useful starting place for scenario work, it can’t be our end point: we need to look at outlier signals and possibilities as well. The second pitfall we need to be aware of is playing “pick your favourite scenario”; it can be tempting to anchor on the scenarios that look best for our particular mix of assets and stakeholders. As planners and policy makers, working with a variety of scenarios enables us to put boundary markers around the decisions we’re considering, reckoning with a gradient of plausible and possible outcomes while avoiding these two cognitive traps. So, by predicting what makes sense to predict and leveraging scenarios for those things that are too complex or variable, what does that enable us to do? In industry, it allows decision-makers to hedge their bets, building a portfolio that covers the range of possible outcomes while considering the timing of emerging opportunities. For government, its utility is twofold, allowing governments to understand the potential impact of their policy choices, while also enabling policy-making that is more flexible and durable to external forces for a wider variety of stakeholders in a more diverse set of futures, encouraging the development of policies that enable adaptation rather than path dependence. It’s in the middle space between these two kinds of model-based decision-making that the EFPC aims to sit, with the goal of answering the question: how might we use the levers of policy to enable industry and citizens in Alberta to achieve good outcomes across a range of climate and energy futures? Models help us do that, with both greater confidence and a deeper appreciation for the risks and opportunities that might lie ahead. Dr. Sara Hastings Simon is Assistant Professor Department of Physics and Astronomy, and the School of Public Policy Director MSc in Sustainable Energy Development (SEDV). and Director MSc in Sustainable Energy Development. #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Regional_Pathways #Clean_Technologies #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #Modelling #Sustainable_Finance #2021

Harnessing possible futures for better policy outcomes

As members of the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative, we spend a lot of time thinking about the future (it’s right in the name!). One way of thinking about policy is as a stated direction for how we might collectively  be  in the future, alongside the boundaries and incentives that we think might help us get there. To carve out a successful path using policy, we try to imagine and understand what pitfalls and opportunities might be just over the horizon. To help us figure that out, we use...

A just transition to net-zero won’t be easy and anyone who claims it will be is either kidding themselves or ignoring the complexities of this challenge. The truth is, net-zero by 2050 is a tall order. Pair that with the need to enable a just transition and there’s a challenge spanning whole new heights. But that’s not to say that creating a more inclusive and equitable net-zero future is out of reach. With government and business leaders getting ready to converge in Glasgow for the global climate conference, it is a relief to see that the majority of countries are committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. Meanwhile, the Paris Agreement not only embedded net-zero as the target for 2050, it also included the concept of “just transition”: a shift to net-zero that is equitable, inclusive, and prosperous. In other words, we can’t leave anyone behind. This implies that  how  we achieve this challenge is about more than just technology or the right policies. It’s about  people. With this in mind, a just transition must reflect the voices of those who will be impacted most. Why? Because, while ultimately everyone will be impacted by the transition to net-zero, some people are likely to be harder hit than others, including youth, women, BIPOC communities, and fossil fuel workers. For example, here in Canada, approximately 140,300 people were employed in Alberta’s upstream energy sector alone in 2017. In addition, an Indigenous worker is three times more likely than the average non-Indigenous worker to be employed in extractive industries. These communities will likely experience out-sized impacts as the world moves away from traditional resource extraction. Many of these same groups have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic and accompanying economic crisis. Without conscious intervention, these social inequities will likely be exacerbated even further by the transition to net-zero. The question is, how do we support a just transition while also accelerating the race to net-zero in Canada? The Government of Canada recently released its  People-Centred Just Transition Discussion Paper , to which many companies and organizations across the country responded. Through numerous conversations with Fellows of the  Energy Futures Lab, we came to a relatively simple conclusion: a top-down approach to deploying policy is a good start, but isn’t enough to enable a just transition. We are in a “yes, and” moment, where the urgency and complexity of the crisis calls for both government intervention  and  community-level engagement and policy co-creation. It’s essential for policymakers to hear directly from the individuals, communities, and industries who will be most impacted, and to understand their unique skill sets, needs, and value systems. Only then can we identify and co-create solutions and opportunities that will not only help these individuals survive the energy transition, but thrive in a net-zero economy. This means adopting an on-the-ground, community approach so that we go beyond the usual suspects and empower communities to co-create solutions that address their specific needs and issues. In addition, rather than spending time trying to achieve “strong social consensus,” as described in the proposed federal principles, it may be more effective to meet people where they are. A just transition is not solely a transition of “the willing.”  More than two-thirds of Canadian fossil fuel workers are interested in jobs in a net-zero economy, 58% see themselves thriving in that economy, and nearly nine in 10 want training and upskilling for net-zero employment . To minimize harm while maximizing opportunities for as many as possible, an approach could be to create opportunities for these under-employed oil and gas workers while  also  designing social and economic safety nets for those who are struggling with the transition. For example, deploying both rapid upskilling programs and early retirement incentives. Direct funding for projects and programs that support workers won’t be enough to realize a just transition. New economic opportunities, enabled by supportive policy, are critical. Government can play an essential role in enabling investment opportunities that build upon our existing assets and infrastructure, as well as supporting the  development of new opportunities  that are aligned with net-zero ambitions. We have so many built-in advantages here in Canada, as a stable democracy with some of the most highly skilled workers in the world. Let’s not miss our moment. There’s a lot to think about. However, policymakers don’t need to do this thinking alone. By seeking out diverse community and industry perspectives, Canada will have a much higher chance of hitting something akin to a homerun. At the end of the day, we believe that decentralizing policy development through co-creation is an essential step towards enabling a truly just transition. It’s time our actions and policies reflect the voices of those who will be impacted most. Alison Cretney is the managing director of the Energy Futures Lab, a coalition of innovators working together to advance solutions to create an energy system that is ‘fit for the future.’ As a sustainability consultant, social innovator and former oil and gas engineer, Cretney has worked at the intersection of energy, environment and collaboration for nearly 20 years. Elizabeth Shirt is the managing director of GLOBE Series, which designs signature and client events that bring together the innovators and changemakers who are accelerating the clean economy. The conversation on how we enable a just transition to a net-zero future will continue at  GLOBE Forum 2022  | February 15–17, 2022. #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Regional_Pathways #Workforce_Readiness #Alberta_Energy_Narrative_Hearts_and_Minds #2021 #Federal_Policy #Provincial_Policy #Sustainable_Finance

A just transition must reflect the voices of those who will be impacted most’

A just transition to net-zero won’t be easy and anyone who claims it will be is either kidding themselves or ignoring the complexities of this challenge. The truth is, net-zero by 2050 is a tall order. Pair that with the need to enable a just transition and there’s a challenge spanning whole new heights. But that’s not to say that creating a more inclusive and equitable net-zero future is out of reach. With government and business leaders getting ready to converge in Glasgow for the global...

How the federal and Alberta governments can support investment in low-carbon activities that build on Alberta’s strengths Una Jefferson is a Research Associate at the Smart Prosperity Institute. She is a member of the working group for the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative. Albertans think their economy is too dependent on oil and gas, according to  a 2020 poll . Albertan firms are already working on repurposing assets from Alberta’s hydrocarbon industry towards economic activities that are more competitive in a decarbonizing world, from  lithium  to  geothermal energy  to  clean hydrogen . These assets — including workforce skills, infrastructure, intellectual property, and natural resources — could give Alberta a competitive edge in some of these new markets. The  Energy Futures  Policy Collaborative (EFPC), in which the Smart Prosperity Institute (SPI) is a research partner, has begun referring to this set of opportunities as future-fit hydrocarbons. The federal and provincial governments have helped to build up these assets. For example, Alberta has world-class infrastructure and expertise in carbon capture and storage (CCS) thanks to billions of dollars in public RD&D and financing support and the double TIER credits granted to some CCS projects. Even so, CCS is still only economically viable for a handful of projects that receive direct public support. This support needs to be paired with policies to drive down the cost of financing and running CCS projects and help them earn revenue. How can Alberta move from piecemeal support for specific projects to broad support for strategic low-carbon markets? What is missing is a framework for selecting and coordinating policies. SPI, as part of the EFPC, has published a  framework  to guide policymakers in designing a suite of policies to support investment in future-fit hydrocarbons. The private sector can’t do this alone Critics of past Alberta governments’ economic diversification efforts have  argued  that “if a project were economically viable […] the private sector would already have done it”. It is true that governments should avoid competing with the private sector in established markets. But markets for future-fit hydrocarbons are far from established. Markets don’t work without public assets like the rule of law, basic science, education, and a low level of risk around pricing and demand. Governments have the ongoing task of ensuring that this foundation exists for economic activities that are in the public interest. And right now, this foundation is incomplete for future-fit hydrocarbons. Take clean hydrogen as an example. Clean hydrogen suffers from an unfortunate quadruple whammy of characteristics that deter investors: it is a capital-intensive, early-stage, environmental technology that only makes economic sense when used by many people (or in large quantities). Private investors can’t capture all of the value associated with less climate change or more knowledge, because these benefits are also enjoyed by the public. And, like railroads or pipelines, hydrogen systems require considerable up-front capital and coordinated allocation of that capital. This is why Canadian governments have a long history of supporting railway and pipeline construction. Markets are great at incremental improvement, but they need government leadership for big, risky changes motivated by the long-term public interest. For example,  Premier Lougheed began investing in exploiting Alberta’s oil sands  against the advice of the oil industry, which preferred investments with more certain short-term returns. While the private sector is already experimenting with future-fit hydrocarbons, these markets will not develop without government support. To navigate the current economic and environmental crises, Albertans need government leadership with an eye on the entire province’s long-term needs. What does government leadership look like? Supporting investment in future-fit hydrocarbons will require more than a handful of incentives. Governments need to consider how technologies are developed, adopted, commercialized, and improved. SPI’s  Clean Innovation Framework , which was developed through dozens of expert interviews, identifies four types of public policy needed to encourage investment in clean innovation: PUSH policies  to spark new ideas and turn them into new technologies, processes, and business models PULL policies  to develop early markets for innovations GROW policies  to help firms commercialize innovations STRENGTHEN policies  to help innovative firms thrive and encourage learning and collaboration SPI has adapted this framework for future-fit hydrocarbons in Alberta. The result is a framework intended to maximize the impact of scarce government resources through focused, technology-agnostic public policies and public-private collaboration. It recognizes that developing technology is only half the battle and devotes equal focus to adoption and use. Avoiding a boondoggle Markets are changing quickly as the world attempts to decarbonize, and it is not yet clear which technologies, processes, and business models will succeed. Governments should expect to support some failures in the pursuit of success: governments are helpful precisely because they can tolerate more risk than the private sector. But governments should design policies carefully to minimize the cost of failure. Firstly, they   should  avoid spreading their resources too thinly . The federal and Alberta governments do not have the resources to dabble in every clean technology. Doing clean hydrogen well, for example, would require substantial, focused public investment. Federal, provincial, municipal, and Indigenous governments need to perform strategic planning to decide whether clean hydrogen is a good match with existing assets, and coordinate their decisions and policies with each other. Second, they should  lean into their strengths . Most governments do not have the specialized knowledge needed to identify commercially viable or useful projects. But they do have a high risk tolerance, deep pockets, and a mandate to identify and communicate long-term societal priorities. Governments should involve the private sector in decisions about how to allocate support and avoid competing with private investors, while filling in the gaps in private investment and providing stable signals through policies such as carbon prices and carbon intensity standards. Third, they should  balance focus with agility . The ability to recognize and act on failure early may be the  most important common feature  of successful industrial and innovation policies. When supporting investment in clean hydrogen, for example, governments risk supporting lock-in of technologies that may prove to be too dirty, expensive, or unpopular. To avoid this, they should focus on outcomes such as life-cycle carbon intensity and prioritize investments that can be repurposed. If Alberta is to remain competitive, federal and provincial governments need to provide support for investment in low-carbon industries which build on Alberta’s strengths. But support policies will be ineffective and wasteful if they are not focused and coordinated. A marketplace framework can help governments rise to this challenge. #Future_Economy #Regional_Pathways #Clean_Technologies #Culture_Shift #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #2021 #Federal_Policy #Lithium_from_Brine #Geothermal_Energy #Hydrogen #Provincial_Policy

Support markets, not just one-off projects, to grow Alberta’s clean economy

How the federal and Alberta governments can support investment in low-carbon activities that build on Alberta’s strengths Una Jefferson is a Research Associate at the Smart Prosperity Institute. She is a member of the working group for the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative. Albertans think their economy is too dependent on oil and gas, according to  a 2020 poll . Albertan firms are already working on repurposing assets from Alberta’s hydrocarbon industry towards economic activities that are...

We are surrounded by technical achievements — often near-miraculous, even if they may get taken for granted. The electricity grid that delivers a safe, constant and predictable stream of on-demand energy. Communication systems that allow real-time conversations with people on the other side of the earth. Networks of food delivery that allows us to enjoy fresh, safe, and relatively inexpensive produce in all seasons. Each of these ‘miracles’ actually represents a complex system that came into being only through the concerted efforts of a broad range of actors. Underpinning that coordinated action is, more often than not, government policy. Now, we face a new set of challenges around energy transition, emissions reduction, and the ongoing wellbeing of our fellow human beings. Policy will be at the root of decisions made about what actions get taken in this brave new world. Policy can be used to shape behaviour: of consumers, of markets, of producers, of investors, of competing jurisdictions. It provides both a vision for the future and the set of rules to be followed in getting there. As such, it is the foundational piece that underlies decisions about the complex systems surrounding a successful energy transition. But how, exactly, does the government do that? What are the tools at its disposal? And what actions can a group such as the EFPC request the government take? To answer this question, we developed a list of government policy levers   that could be useful as part of the energy transition, and specifically in helping drive investment into innovation and infrastructure: Vision:  By providing vision and direction at a high level through strategies, goals, targets, or roadmaps, government can show enduring support and provide predictability and stability. The recently published federal hydrogen strategy and the small modular reactor (SMR) roadmap are clear examples. Economic tools : The government is in a unique position to direct fiscal resources — its own or that of others — towards areas where it wants to incentivize development. Economic tools include direct financial support, procurement (the federal government alone procures over $20 billion per year of goods and services), fiscal policy measures, and making capital available to entrepreneurs — such as through the Canada Infrastructure Bank. Asset planning : The government can use its power to influence the development and deployment of different classes of assets, including people, physical infrastructure, and natural assets. In its  Healthy Environment, Healthy Economy  plan published in December 2020, the federal government promised to conduct the first-ever national infrastructure assessment to identify needs and priorities for the supportive assets and infrastructure that will underlie the energy transition. Regulatory approaches : These are the rules created by government that individuals and organizations — companies, investors, even the government itself — must abide by. They include regulation of capital markets and regulation of GHG emissions, but also land use regulations, royalty schemes, and other rules that shape market and policy agendas. Market development : Domestic and international market receptivity can be shaped by government actions and agreements, such as international trade agreements, export market development, and creating opportunities to stimulate domestic demand for certain products. Quality assurance : There is a role for government in boosting confidence in the quality and acceptability of products and technologies. These may come in the form of emissions standards (such as methane emissions standards), performance standards (such as for automobiles), or endorsement of specific certification schemes (as with Canada’s several forestry performance management certification options). Finally, there are a number of policy levers that don’t fall neatly into the categories above, including research and commercial collaboration, collecting and disseminating data and information, and convening stakeholders. These levers each have long histories of success in fostering innovation and investment, in the energy sector and beyond. With a clear sense of what options might look like, our task in the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative is a complex but essential one: to determine which levers to pull when, how hard to pull, and who should be operating those levers. To do this, we’re making sure we think both deeply and broadly about how this metaphorical machine might fit together, considering which unintended gears a given lever might turn if we aren’t careful and what unwanted outputs our machine might produce, but also which levers in combination might multiply the force we apply, delivering dividends that ripple across the system. #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Clean_Technologies #Regional_Pathways #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #Sustainable_Finance #Provincial_Policy #2021

Policy Levers and the Energy Transition

We are surrounded by technical achievements — often near-miraculous, even if they may get taken for granted. The electricity grid that delivers a safe, constant and predictable stream of on-demand energy. Communication systems that allow real-time conversations with people on the other side of the earth. Networks of food delivery that allows us to enjoy fresh, safe, and relatively inexpensive produce in all seasons. Each of these ‘miracles’ actually represents a complex system that came into...

This post is part 3 of 3 exploring sustainable finance, bringing together the perspectives of three of our Core Working Group members: Patrycja Drainville (Associate Director, Sustainable Finance, Scotiabank), Chad Park (Vice President, Sustainability & Citizenship, The Cooperators), and Jamie Bonham (Director of Corporate Engagement, NEI Investments) Italian writer and philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli knew a thing or two about power, and his observations have guided politicians for hundreds of years. And while his writings have been used by those seeking to protect or preserve their standing, he had plenty to say to those who are on the side of change and progress. “It ought to be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things,” Machiavelli wrote in The Prince . “Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. This coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them.” You’d be hard pressed to find a better description of the political landscape in 2021, and that’s particularly true when it comes to the energy transition and the delicate pivot from higher-carbon energy to lower-carbon solutions. “What we’re trying to do is make something happen,” says NEI Investments’ Jamie Bonham, “and there is no guarantee of success here.” But as Scotiabank sustainability expert Patrycja Drainville says, this evolutionary process that’s currently underway in the oil and gas industry isn’t completely new. After all, one of Alberta’s other major industries went through a similar experience two decades ago. “When I think about what’s happening to our industry, a good parallel is the forestry sector 20 years ago, when they were the poster child for all these different ENGO campaigns,” she says. Those campaigns created pressure, and that pressure pushed some of the companies to adapt and improve. You could call it “survival of the cleanest” — and the forestry industry is living proof that many companies can survive. “We use paper still, and we do so much shipping with boxes. But those recycling practices emerged, and they have set a high standard for operating practices around forestry,” Drainville says. “So I think there are some very strong parallels there. The bullseye will keep moving around, and it’s our turn. But I think we can get to a place where the world feels comfortable, and we’re producing a much better product.” Capitalism, in other words, will do the work of sorting the best performers from the laggards — work that will take on growing importance and prominence as the price of carbon continues to rise. “They’ll just be a much higher standard of operating, and there will be a bit of a cleanup of the companies that just can’t meet that,” she says. “That’s a healthy thing, really.” And while it might be tempting for some people to deprive the oil and gas industry of the capital and other financial resources it needs to do that cleanup, that may only slow the progress they want to see. “I would rather see us try to leverage it into something positive, instead of just tearing it down and building something new elsewhere,” Bonham says. Drainville, who now works for one of the major Canadian financial institutions (Scotiabank) that her former company (Suncor Energy) and others like it will depend on, agrees with that assessment. “They get really caught in the idea of supporting the oil and gas sector, and they pull back when it’s actually the sector that’s doing a lot of the changing that we need. But every organization has to embrace the change first, and then move fast, if we’re going to meet our emissions target.” In other words, says The Cooperators’ Chad Park, the true acts of climate leadership aren’t ones that focus on divestment and disengagement. Instead, they’re in the messy middle — where capital can most effectively motivate companies to move in the right direction. “The whole financial industry has thrown its whole weight into this,” Bonham says, “and I think it will accelerate a lot of the change.” Or, as Park says, “in my view, climate leadership in investing should be less about what an investor won’t do with their money and more about what they will do.” #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Regional_Pathways #Clean_Technologies #Sustainable_Finance #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #2021

Survival of the Cleanest: Why low-carbon can equal high-success for Alberta’s energy sector

This post is part 3 of 3 exploring sustainable finance, bringing together the perspectives of three of our Core Working Group members: Patrycja Drainville (Associate Director, Sustainable Finance, Scotiabank), Chad Park (Vice President, Sustainability & Citizenship, The Cooperators), and Jamie Bonham (Director of Corporate Engagement, NEI Investments) Italian writer and philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli knew a thing or two about power, and his observations have guided politicians for hundreds...

Transition is a sticky word for a lot of people. Add “net-zero” or “pipeline” to the mix and you might even spark a wave of public passion. But emotions are always anchored in something and those relating to Alberta’s energy transition carry no exception. Sure, through the years we’ve talked about net-zero by 2050 but these conversations have often carried an element of speculation. A nice theory, one might say, but how  will we get there? While the answer to this question is neither simple nor obvious, the events of last week offer a little insight into the nature of energy transition. First, we celebrated as the province’s largest oil sands producers came together behind a shared vision for a net-zero future. Then, we celebrated some more with the announcement of a possible $1.3 billion investment into a net-zero hydrogen energy complex just east of Edmonton. It appeared things were really coming together. We felt on track. Then, in the wake of a few very big wins, a heavy steel-toed boot landed in our midst with a resounding thump . The Keystone XL pipeline breathed its last breaths somewhere in southeastern Alberta and a myriad of emotions quickly swept across the province. We continue to lament for different reasons, sure… Jobs will be lost, the fate of Alberta’s oil and gas industry grows murkier, and the loss of a $1.3 billion investment is far from digestible.  But here’s the thing: no one said energy transition would be easy. No one claimed there wouldn’t be losses- even big ones- or that there wouldn’t be fear and uncertainty. It may be human nature to crave stability, but stability doesn’t always entail a sense of certainty. We couldn’t know for sure how Keystone XL would play out, in the same way that we cannot know for sure how a hydrogen economy will unfold. Still, we place bets knowing that reward entails risk. However, while we can’t predict the future, we can make decisions with the end in mind. At the Energy Futures Lab, a coalition of Alberta innovators focused on energy transition, we lean on vision-driven innovation to help us uncover solutions for our energy future. But energy transition is about more than just innovation. It’s something that impacts each of us in different ways. This week, we not only witnessed, but also felt what it means to navigate energy transition. It means celebrating big wins while collectively acknowledging and feeling big losses. And we need to do this together.  As the energy transition accelerates, weeks like last week will become all the more common. We’ll see more big announcements, more wins and losses. This means that some days will be more hope-filled than others and to get through the tougher times, we’ll need to remain pragmatic. We’ll need to remember what’s at stake and to ensure that we leave no one behind. Energy transition entails a collective effort. It’s not for a select few to grieve the loss of Keystone while others race full-fledged towards a hydrogen economy. No, it reflects a time for us to come together as a province and accept that energy transition will never be easy. But then again, easy is not what we’re after. #Corporate_Policy #EFL_Vision #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Clean_Technologies  #Regional_Pathways #Pipelines #2021

Big wins and big losses will continue shaping Alberta’s energy transition

Transition is a sticky word for a lot of people. Add “net-zero” or “pipeline” to the mix and you might even spark a wave of public passion. But emotions are always anchored in something and those relating to Alberta’s energy transition carry no exception. Sure, through the years we’ve talked about net-zero by 2050 but these conversations have often carried an element of speculation. A nice theory, one might say, but how will we get there? While the answer to this question is neither simple...

This post is part 2 of 3 exploring sustainable finance, bringing together the perspectives of three of our Core Working Group members: Patrycja Drainville (Associate Director, Sustainable Finance, Scotiabank), Chad Park (Vice President, Sustainability & Citizenship, The Cooperators), and Jamie Bonham (Director of Corporate Engagement, NEI Investments) As vaccines pour in across the developed world, jobs are coming back by the thousands to industries and sectors that were hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic. There are, however, a few notable exceptions, and one of the most notable of all is the oil and gas industry. While prices have recovered to where they were pre-pandemic, the work — and the workers — have not. And as a recent report from Deloitte suggested , many of them may be gone forever as the world transitions towards lower-carbon sources of energy. That transition is irreversible, regardless of whether some people want to see it happen or not. “Canada is too small,” NEI Investments’ Jamie Bonham says. “Even if we wanted to be absolutely obstructionist, it will do nothing to stop this transition from happening. Once you have that context, you can start to think about resilience to it.” That’s where future-fit hydrocarbons can, and should, play a major role. After all, we can’t assume that everyone who currently works in the oil and gas industry will be able to transition easily — or even at all — to careers in renewables and green energy. And while governments can paper that over with support programs aimed at re-training and re-skilling, that’s not going to be an appetizing prospect for many. But with future-fit hydrocarbons, we get the best of both worlds: a bridge to a lower-carbon economy, and an economic path that honours the skills and knowledge of today’s workers. Scotiabank sustainability expert Patrycja Drainville is a big fan of the idea. “I love the future-fit concept, because I think it still indicates that the commodity as it is, and as it exists today, is a relevant commodity. What I think people want is for there to be some greater responsibility around it as it relates to what the customer wants.” And while experts will disagree on exactly when global demand for oil will peak, and how quickly it will decline on the other side of that apex, there is no question that oil will be used in substantial quantities for decades to come. By adding new uses for Alberta’s bitumen reserves, companies and governments can help lengthen the transition runway — and help Alberta’s oil sands companies take flight from it. “Those are the companies that are going to be able to attract this kind of climate-concerned investing,” says The Co-operators’ Chad Park. “But they need a little bit of support there.” That support could help the hundreds of thousands of Albertans with skills and expertise in the existing energy sector put them to work on building the new one. “We have so much to work with — it’s building from something, as opposed to building something new. And to me, that’s the most cogent argument for the future-fit hydrocarbons — the fact that we don’t have to recreate the wheel entirely here,” Bonham says. “We have a lot in place that’s going to be really critical to what we need to achieve.” There’s no better example of how today’s energy sector can help build an important bridge to tomorrow’s than with carbon capture and storage technologies. For companies, it allows them to experiment in areas where they’re already comfortable, and add value to their existing operations. Witness the recent announcement by Advantage Oil & Gas that it has developed what it calls “breakthrough carbon capture and storage technology capable of commercial profitability at a carbon price below CDN$50/tonne.” That technology will be applied at its gas plant near Grande Prairie and put into service by March 2022, but the company thinks it can be applied to a much wider range of industries. “The Modular Carbon Capture and Storage (“MCCS”) technology can be retrofitted to most point-source industrial emissions, including sectors that are difficult to decarbonize like power generation, blue hydrogen, LNG, oil and gas processing, and production of cement and steel,” it said in its press release. Advantage’s announcement is just the kind of thing that can help shift perceptions about the role that today’s oil and gas industry can and should play in helping build the energy system of the future. “The kind of technologies and solutions we’re trying to create here are going to go well beyond the oil and gas industry,” Drainville says. “I think it would be short-sighted to see it as just a lifeline for a single industry.” But in order for more of this sort of “practice” to happen, governments will have to find a way to get on the same page. “We’re still disagreeing about that,” she says. “Governments need to all get on board, and move faster before other economies leap-frog Canada.” If they do, many of the jobs that have been permanently lost in traditional oil and gas can be replaced by new ones. But the longer those governments wait, the harder it will be for them to build public support for the energy transition. And if they can’t do that, they risk missing out on one of the biggest new economic opportunities of the century. This post is part 2 of 3 exploring sustainable finance, bringing together the perspectives of three of our Core Working Group members: Patrycja Drainville (Associate Director, Sustainable Finance, Scotiabank), Chad Park (Vice President, Sustainability & Citizenship, The Cooperators), and Jamie Bonham (Director of Corporate Engagement, NEI Investments) #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Clean_Technologies #Regional_Pathways #Sustainable_Finance #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #2021 #CCUS #FutureFit_Hydrocarbons

Why Future Fit Hydrocarbons are the bridge to a better future

This post is part 2 of 3 exploring sustainable finance, bringing together the perspectives of three of our Core Working Group members: Patrycja Drainville (Associate Director, Sustainable Finance, Scotiabank), Chad Park (Vice President, Sustainability & Citizenship, The Cooperators), and Jamie Bonham (Director of Corporate Engagement, NEI Investments) As vaccines pour in across the developed world, jobs are coming back by the thousands to industries and sectors that were hit hard by the...

This post is part 1 of 3 exploring sustainable finance, bringing together the perspectives of three of our Core Working Group members: Patrycja Drainville (Associate Director, Sustainable Finance, Scotiabank), Chad Park (Vice President, Sustainability & Citizenship, The Cooperators), and Jamie Bonham (Director of Corporate Engagement, NEI Investments) If there was ever any doubt that net-zero finance was the way of the future, former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor Mark Carney cleared it up in a March 29th tweet. “Huge announcement today that the core of the global asset management industry, managing over $32 trillion in assets, is committing to addressing climate change [and] delivering the goals of the Paris Agreement.” When you start talking about that many trillions of dollars, even the most ardent skeptic is forced to sit up and start listening. Carney’s certainly not the first person to say this out loud, mind you. But his comments are just part of a growing conversation that has captivated the global financial community, as well as industries like Canada’s energy sector that depend on it to help fund their operations. “The thing I wish more people really grasped is how significant and massive the drive towards climate-concerned investing is,” says Chad Park, the vice president of sustainability and citizenship with The Cooperators. “There could be opportunity in that for Alberta, if we play our cards right.” And make no mistake: Alberta has a good hand, especially when it comes to so-called “future-fit hydrocarbons”. Its bitumen can be put to work in any number of new applications, from carbon fibre to asphalt and graphene, and these could be multi-billion dollar markets in the very near future. Its natural gas, meanwhile, can be used to create some of the most economically competitive blue hydrogen — that is, hydrogen produced using natural gas and carbon capture and sequestration technology — in the world. But, Park says, that will require everyone to put more of their chips into the middle first. “We need to signal our alignment with the net-zero emissions goal, because that’s a first principle. All of these investors are trying to align their portfolios with a 1.5 degree future, and they’re not just doing it to showcase their virtue, although there’s some of that. They’re also doing it because of the impact finance can have on achieving the goal and because they think there’s money to be made in the transition.” Before she took a new job at Scotiabank, Patrycja Drainville spent the last decade working in the energy sector on the increasingly busy intersection between sustainability and finance. And while she says the conversation about ESG (environment, sustainability, and governance) concerns used to be confined to select parts of her organization, it has now reached centre stage. “What I think has changed now is that everyone — every company, every government — has this very clear mandate to be part of climate action.” In the energy sector, that mandate clearly includes reducing emissions, and most of the large companies operating in it have made some sort of commitment to reaching net-zero emissions in the future. Those commitments are coming from the top, too. “Carbon risk has never really been accounted for at the board level until maybe two or three years ago,” Drainville says. “It’s only now at the right level of the organization, to start really making meaningful change.” But while she’s optimistic about the energy sector’s ability to rise to this challenge, she’s also clear that this transformation won’t happen overnight. “These companies can’t flip their business models on their head overnight,” Drainville says. “There’s some patient capital that’s required to get us through this change.” That’s where people like Jamie Bonham, the director of corporate engagement with NEI Investments, come in. The recent surge in oil prices of their COVID-driven lows has sparked a renewed sense of optimism in the energy sector, but Bonham says that this boom won’t be like any of the other ones that came before it. In the past, the choice faced by companies was simple: pay out their surging cash flows to investors, or invest them back into the ground in order to grow. Now, with growth circumscribed by both looming concerns about peaking demand and the increasingly heavy hand of capital markets, they face a much different one. “It’s a real inflection point here, because knowing investors, they’re going to be pushing for those dividends and getting that money back in their pockets. That’s fine, but it’s not the model that’s going to get you to long-term success. So it’s tough for companies right now to make the case to put that money into something else — which is what they need to do.” In order for them to do it, Bonham says, they need to know that the policies in place today won’t get undermined tomorrow. “If we could agree on the basic tenets of it, and say these fundamental tenets like the price on carbon are not going to change, nor is the ambition and targets that we set, then that would be a platform they could build these projects on, knowing it makes sense.” They’re also still risking a journey into the so-called valley of death, where good ideas can often get tripped up before they mature into profitable businesses. “To get from here to there takes a bit of a leap of faith. I think there’s a number of investors out there who are ready for this opportunity. We just have to create it.” This post is part 1 of 3 exploring sustainable finance, bringing together the perspectives of three of our Core Working Group members: Patrycja Drainville (Associate Director, Sustainable Finance, Scotiabank), Chad Park (Vice President, Sustainability & Citizenship, The Cooperators), and Jamie Bonham (Director of Corporate Engagement, NEI Investments). #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Clean_Technologies #Regional_Pathways #Sustainable_Finance #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #2021

Capital Concerns: Why big business is driving the shift towards lower-carbon capitalism (and why Alberta can be a part of it)

This post is part 1 of 3 exploring sustainable finance, bringing together the perspectives of three of our Core Working Group members: Patrycja Drainville (Associate Director, Sustainable Finance, Scotiabank), Chad Park (Vice President, Sustainability & Citizenship, The Cooperators), and Jamie Bonham (Director of Corporate Engagement, NEI Investments) If there was ever any doubt that net-zero finance was the way of the future, former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor Mark Carney...

We’re often told that we need to do a better job of  telling our stories.  There are plenty of  narrative opportunities  to be explored within the energy sector and yet, despite an emerging consensus around the importance of storytelling, it’s often difficult to identify and breathe life into the stories that shape our companies, technologies or relationships with energy. So in this post, I’ll explore a few practical approaches to storytelling that we can draw on to spark curiosity, empathy and action within Canada’s energy sector. For starters, developing a compelling story is no easy task. In fact, a writer must navigate difficult terrain in a way that sometimes parallels how energy companies approach resource development. On its own, the idea for a story is no more valuable than sunlight, heat from the earth’s core or a formation containing natural gas. Rather, the idea contains  potential;  there’s an inherent value, a spark that can be harnessed and transformed into something powerful. It is the storyteller’s job to recognize this potential and find ways to make use of it. As part of this process, we need to investigate the landscape, assess potential returns on investment and develop blueprints. In other words, we need to scope the idea, determine its value and storyboard our work before any shovels hit the ground. This work can begin with an initial assessment. Assess how “story worthy” an idea is by asking a few pointed questions: How might I transform this information in a way that’s useful? How will the energy I input into the work compare with the output? What are the consequences of telling or not telling this story? Who will benefit and/or suffer from the telling of this story? Where does this story fit into the broader landscape? Everywhere we turn, there are trace elements pointing to the existence of characters, dialogues and settings. So while anything  can  be turned into a story, the value of this initial assessment lies in its ability to help us determine whether an idea can be turned into a really good and impactful story. Once we’ve deemed an idea “story worthy,” we can move forward into a development phase. In the rest of this post, you’ll find some practical approaches to storytelling that you can draw on as you develop your idea. To help explain these approaches, I’ve journeyed down a somewhat nostalgic path to draw on wisdom captured in the fable of The Three Little Pigs and the Big Bad Wolf. Position your work contextually It’s common for people to do everything in their power to “prove” the side of a story that best aligns with their intentions. For example, it might be tempting to offer hope by way of omitting a reference to potential challenges. Or perhaps there’s a desire to discredit a particular technology, only to avoid discussing viable alternatives. This can result in cherry-picking at its finest. If your story truly has legs, then positioning it within a broader (and honest) context should only  add  value. Moral of the story:  If the big, bad wolf can blow your story over in just one breath, you’d best lay a more solid foundation. People care about other people At the end of the day, while new technologies are fascinating and worthy of description, a story is a place to foster connection and one of the most effective ways to do this is by focusing on the people around whom the story revolves. For example, it’s much easier to understand and relate to a technology if you first understand  who  created it,  why  they created it and  how  it’s had a transformative effect on that person or their community. You can step into their shoes and view this technology from their perspective, from the perspective of another being with whom you share commonality. Moral of the story:  While the building materials selected by the three little pigs certainly played a central role in shaping this infamous kid’s story, we’re more interested in the pigs themselves and the ways in which their lives are impacted by their construction choices. Focusing solely on the quality of building materials or the structural integrity of each home rather than the pigs themselves would never have had the same impact. Anchor visions for the future within recognizable timelines There’s a reason most futuristic stories focus on things like flying cars and space travel. While we have a certain degree of influence over the future, most of the time, the future seems a faraway place yet to be defined. But there is an interesting tension to explore between our vision for the future and our current reality. We can’t simply place all of our hopes, dreams and aspirations solely in the context of the future, and yet to incite change, we also require a sense of direction. This is why anchoring a vision within today’s context is so helpful:  it helps bridge the gap between today’s world and tomorrow’s . For example, a futuristic hydrogen economy might strike some as belonging to an ideal future, but if it remains difficult for people to see  how  we’ll get there, the idea can remain dreamlike, utopian or even hopeless. If we can  show  how today’s resources, investments and workforce have the potential to unlock these opportunities, the story begins to depict a future worth striving for. Moral of the story:   Because we bore witness to the pigs’ construction efforts, we can better understand how and why the eldest pig was able to live “happily ever after.” The pig’s future appears secure because of the decisions it made in the present. As such, we are inclined to believe in the pig’s happy future, understanding that this future was only made possible by his current efforts. Involve the community As professionals working within the energy system, our networks will play an important role in facilitating the global energy transition. Nevertheless, we can’t undertake this endeavor alone. Rather, we can engage people from other professions to assist us in creating our energy future. We can seek out artists, writers, actors, videographers and other skilled creatives to support our efforts. Sometimes we’ve got the idea for a good story, but there’s someone else better suited for its execution. Moral of the story:  The first two pigs knew they wanted to build comfortable homes but lacked the required expertise to account for the homes’ structural integrity. If we want to have a lasting impact, sometimes the best thing we can do is to seek support from those who are better equipped than we are. Slow down and give yourself permission to write with care It’s easy to get caught up in content creation. We’re expected to produce and share stories with the media and our networks, encouraging many of us to rush creative processes. As a result, we often see “quick hit” pieces that only present one side of a complex, multi-dimensional story. If we’re truly committed to good storytelling, then we need to slow down and take the time to write stories that do justice to the information we’re sharing. Moral of the story:   While transporting loads of brick might be more tiresome for a little pig, the resulting house will be much stronger than one made of straw. If we want great outcomes, sometimes we need to take a harder, more time-consuming route. Strike a balance between hope and realism Hopeful narratives are highly desirable, both for the writer and reader. But while it’s important to offer hope and inspiration, serving up overly optimistic accounts can also result in stories that lose people’s attention. They can seem less credible and driven by bias. This means that it’s our job to offer hope within realistic parameters. Moral of the story:  The story of the three little pigs would have been very different if we’d focused solely on the wolf’s failed attempts to blow down the eldest pig’s brick house. Exposure to all three of the wolf’s attempts gives us the information we need to make sense of his true potential. #Culture_Shift #Alberta_Energy_Narrative_Hearts_and_Minds #2021

Practical Approaches to Storytelling: A Guide for Energy Professionals

We’re often told that we need to do a better job of  telling our stories.  There are plenty of  narrative opportunities  to be explored within the energy sector and yet, despite an emerging consensus around the importance of storytelling, it’s often difficult to identify and breathe life into the stories that shape our companies, technologies or relationships with energy. So in this post, I’ll explore a few practical approaches to storytelling that we can draw on to spark curiosity, empathy...

Alberta’s hydrocarbon sector faced an uncertain future in a world moving towards lower-carbon energy before the pandemic, with existing trends  accelerating  since March 2020. This uncertainty towards the future of the sector offers both risks and opportunities. The province’s rich natural resource wealth and highly skilled workforce have potential to capture a growing share of the clean technology market, and play a pivotal role in reaching climate targets. In order for Alberta’s oil and gas sector to play a significant role in advancing either objective, it must first address its challenge in attracting private capital. In order to do that, the province will need to advance projects that are attractive to investors. Recently, a range of standards have emerged that are used by investors to evaluate attractiveness, with criteria going beyond traditional financial returns. Investors  increasingly care  about progress towards climate targets, preventing environmental degradation, and taking a more fulsome view of the costs or investment required to realize an investment opportunity. A new  policy brief  by the Smart Prosperity Institute, as part of the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative hosted by the Energy Futures Lab, conducted an evaluation of some of these criteria and standards. This evaluation seeks to answer a specific question: What makes an investment in future-fit hydrocarbons attractive to decision-makers? This work will help provincial stakeholders identify what criteria are used to assess their performance and attractiveness to decision-makers, ensuring they can advance projects that meet those criteria. Being graded on a curve The future is an uncertain place. Investors, policymakers, and academics are increasingly trying to make it less so. This group of stakeholders, collectively referred to as decision-makers, are all thinking about which investments align with the future they (or the Boards and citizens to whom they are beholden) want to live in. These definitions of future fitness have progressed into the evaluation and assessment stage. Decision-makers globally are increasingly using established criteria to evaluate the future-fitness of investment opportunities, including investment frameworks, transition taxonomies, and transition pathways. Importantly, these criteria are based on different sets of concerns than investors have had in previous decades. As efforts to reduce emissions and adapt to climate impacts grow in ambition to match the scale of the challenge, investors are growing increasingly concerned about the risks of stranded assets and maintaining social license to operate. This concern has shifted into action, with quantifiable assessment criteria and performance metrics being developed to minimize risk and measure performance in translating historic principles into current and future practices. Any region or government wanting to attract private capital is aware of these changes. However, while a new investment framework or taxonomy pops up on a seemingly monthly basis, it is not always clear which criteria are emerging as areas of consensus across disciplines and frameworks. Yet these areas of emergent consensus matter a great deal: If Alberta wants to attract capital and support from a broad array of decision-makers, it will need to ensure the projects it advances are attractive based on the criteria they are using. Better identifying these areas of emergent consensus, in turn, can inform how the province wants to define future-fitness in its own right. A definition that aligns with that of decision-makers whose capital is desired could prove catalytic in driving greater investment into provincial opportunities, and could be substantiated by adding Made-in-Alberta criteria that advanced the province’s own goals as well. To support this discussion, Smart Prosperity is conducting analysis to identify what criteria have emerged as implicit areas of consensus between different types of decision-makers internationally, and has identified three questions that virtually all stakeholders ask when evaluating future-fitness: 1.   Does a project reduce absolute emissions in line with achieving science-based targets?  The primary metric being used to assess environmental performance is not whether emissions are reduced, but whether absolute emissions decline at a rate aligned with global achievement of science-based targets set by international bodies. Unless improvements in carbon intensity or efficiency improvements can demonstrate alignment with science-based international targets, they are not likely to meet this standard. 2.   How robust is a project against potential futures?  Robustness across potential futures is the primary lens through which investors assess risk, and policymakers and academic assess attractiveness in a low-carbon future. The primary variable investors use to stress-test projects is how much risk of asset stranding accompanies an investment across futures with different rates of decarbonization. The more aligned an investment is with a zero emissions future, the more robustness (and less risk) it offers to a portfolio. 3.   What level of specialized infrastructure is required to realize this investment opportunity?  Frameworks and taxonomies stress that evaluating the amount of specialized infrastructure required to commercialize a given investment is critical to accurately assessing risk. The less new specialized infrastructure that is required to realize an opportunity, the more likely that commercialization can occur rapidly. If new specialized infrastructure is required at scale, indications of high levels of government support can also serve to reduce risk. Each of these three questions emerges almost uniformly across decision-maker frameworks, taxonomies and pathways discussions. This highlights the need for a given project that credibly respond to all three question if it wants to be considered attractive by a wide range of stakeholders making or influencing investment decisions. Alberta needs to be net-zero aligned if it wants to attract capital Investors want evidence that projects are aligned with a zero, or net-zero, emissions future within the upcoming decades, that a given project is robust across a range of decarbonization scenarios, and that the costs of new infrastructure are being appropriately considered. If those three criteria are not met, then capital will go towards opportunities that can credibly answer these questions. It’s that simple: If a project wants to attract private capital, it needs to score well on the criteria being used by decision-makers. If not, the task is made more difficult. Any Made-In-Alberta definition of future-fitness will need to keep these criteria in mind, since attracting capital is ultimately required to drive the prosperity stakeholders seek to achieve. For a deeper dive into this topic, read the policy brief  Evaluating future fitness: What matters to decision-makers when considering whether a hydrocarbon investment is future fit? . #Future_Economy #Culture_Shift #Clean_Technologies #Regional_Pathways #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #FutureFit_Hydrocarbons #Hydrogen #Rooftop_Solar #Commercial_Solar #Commercial_Wind #Batteries #CCUS #Advanced_Materials #Bitumen_Beyond_Combustion #2021 #Sustainable_Finance

What do decision-makers care about when investing in future-fit hydrocarbons?

Alberta’s hydrocarbon sector faced an uncertain future in a world moving towards lower-carbon energy before the pandemic, with existing trends  accelerating  since March 2020. This uncertainty towards the future of the sector offers both risks and opportunities. The province’s rich natural resource wealth and highly skilled workforce have potential to capture a growing share of the clean technology market, and play a pivotal role in reaching climate targets. In order for Alberta’s oil and gas...

Planning for the future is complicated. We don’t know for sure what the future will look like. That means — and forgive me for being a little nerdy here — defining “future fitness” is a  probabilistic  question: we have to assess “fitness” across a range of possible futures. At the same time, the future also isn’t entirely out of our control. Policy choices we make now can influence which futures are more (or less) likely to come to pass. Sound complicated? A new report from the Canadian Institute for Climate Choices on  net zero pathways  for Canada can help us navigate this complexity by providing a little foresight on what 2050 might look like — and how hydrocarbons might fit into that future. A net zero Canada Let’s start with Canada’s commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions  to “net zero” by 2050  (i.e., Canada removes as many emissions from the atmosphere as it contributes). Canada isn’t alone in this commitment: multiple countries, provinces, cities, and firms are signing on to net zero as part of serious efforts to radically curb emissions within the next few decades. In general, a global shift to net zero is consistent with what climate science tells us we need to avoid the worst  impacts of a changing climate . So, what does a  net zero  Canada look like? The report explores more than 60 scenarios, each of which achieves  net zero emissions  by 2050. Multiple possible  net zero energy systems  emerge from that analysis. Yet each system faces some big hurdles to taking hold and becoming reality. Some factors Alberta can affect via policy choices. Others depend on international markets and are outside its control. Below, I’m going to explore two very different energy systems that emerge from our analysis to illustrate the wide range of possible outcomes for the economy, and for hydrocarbons in particular. An electricity + hydrogen net zero future One possible net zero future for Canada strongly relies on emissions-free electricity and hydrogen. Massive scale-up of various sources of clean electricity can drive electrification of transportation (electric vehicles) and buildings (heat pumps). Meanwhile hydrogen can be used in heavy industry and other applications that are tricky to electrify. This future isn’t a guarantee. It would require big buildouts of electricity transmission infrastructure. Unless electricity storage become significantly cheaper, it might require grid interties linking intermittent renewables in Alberta and Saskatchewan with on-demand hydroelectricity in Manitoba or BC. Enhanced hydrogen infrastructure — from pipelines to production facilities — would likewise be required. Costs of making  blue or green hydrogen  must decline significantly. So how do hydrocarbons fit into this future? Critically, oil and gas have largely been replaced with zero carbon fuels. That’s true in Canada, but also likely internationally as well;  global  scale-up of electricity and hydrogen technologies is probably the key to driving costs down through “learning by doing.” That means that global demand for fossil fuels could decline dramatically, and with it, domestic production and the economic engine of growth it has historically provided. Yet “future-fit hydrocarbons” could go beyond traditional notions of fossil fuels. Zero-emissions hydrogen can be made from  natural gas using carbon capture and storage , as well as  other ,  emerging approaches . A range of  non-combustion products  could be made from Alberta’s hydrocarbon resources. Geothermal electricity might not be a hydrocarbon product, but it could directly  leverage hydrocarbon  industry expertise and capacity to contribute much-needed clean electricity supply. A fossil fuel + carbon removal net zero future A very different net zero future, on the other hand, sees ongoing global consumption of fossil fuels. That future only exists under very specific circumstances. Significant progress on upstream methane emissions and widespread use of advanced carbon capture and negative emissions technologies dramatically reduces emissions from producing oil and gas. And huge scale-up of  carbon removal  offsets emissions that come from consuming   those fuels. Canadian hydrocarbon industries can play an interesting role in such a future. The oil and gas sector continues to drive economic activity. Moreover,  Alberta’s geology  gives it unique opportunities to permanently store GHG emissions. Depending on the national and international policy frameworks that emerge to support carbon removal, Alberta might even have the potential to drive deep  net negative  emissions, by removing and storing carbon in return for valuable emissions trading credits. Yet this pathway is also  far from certain . It likely only comes to pass if  carbon removal technologies  dramatically decrease in costs, and both removal and carbon capture and storage dramatically scale up, everywhere. That’s the only way that long-term demand (and international market prices) for oil and gas stay high, supporting sustained production in Canada (while also achieving net zero). Yet other countries, including the United States, increasingly appear to be pushing toward electrification. Managing uncertainty Planning — and policy-making — in the face of uncertainty is tricky business. Which outcomes are more likely? Which are more desirable? What levers does Alberta have to affect outcomes? A fossil fuel and carbon removal world might seem appealing to oil and gas incumbents. Yet that future is only one of many possible outcomes and, in fact, faces multiple hurdles. Planning  only  for that future is putting all of Alberta’s eggs in one basket. Instead, solutions should be robust  across  the range of potential futures. Breakthroughs in cost-effective carbon removal and storage techniques, for example, will be valuable no matter which path Alberta, Canada, and the world ultimately walk. That doesn’t mean they’re all that Alberta needs. Other net zero opportunities can similarly build on existing capacity, infrastructure, and expertise. We don’t know what a net zero world looks like. But that doesn’t mean we can’t start planning for it. #Future_Economy #Clean_Technologies #Regional_Pathways #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #FutureFit_Hydrocarbons #Electricity #Hydrogen #Rooftop_Solar #Commercial_Solar #Commercial_Wind #Batteries #CCUS #Advanced_Materials #Bitumen_Beyond_Combustion #2021

A closer look at “future-fit”

Planning for the future is complicated. We don’t know for sure what the future will look like. That means — and forgive me for being a little nerdy here — defining “future fitness” is a  probabilistic  question: we have to assess “fitness” across a range of possible futures. At the same time, the future also isn’t entirely out of our control. Policy choices we make now can influence which futures are more (or less) likely to come to pass. Sound complicated? A new report from the Canadian...

Around the world, countries, corporations, and people are picking up the call for a net-zero future. This global rallying cry is highlighting that we need to do more to reach a lower emissions future and we need to do it at an exponential pace. We cannot close the gap between our reality today, and our aspirations for what is possible, without developing and deploying technologies that both manage our greenhouse gas emissions and add value to our economy. The transition to a lower emissions world can’t happen with the flick of a switch. It will require significant work and investment across our economy and across timeframes. The speed of reaching decarbonization goals will depend on the availability of mature technology and the ability to scale supply chains. So, how might we accelerate the pace of innovation and deployment of new technologies across all sectors to take advantage of the tremendous momentum that exists in a world that has been turned upside down? We need smart investment . To remain competitive in today’s economy, we need to invest in our existing energy systems to ensure they are as efficient and environmentally responsible as possible. And, looking forward, if Alberta is going to build off its historic strengths as an energy producer, we need to invest in the energy systems of tomorrow that have a place in an increasingly carbon-constrained world. It’s not an either-or scenario — we need to do both. We need a strong  understanding of the possible pathways  ahead of us , so that industry can develop sound business plans that lay out a future that is attractive to the flow of capital, and so that collaboration and alignment across the innovation ecosystem can flourish. We need governments to send  appropriate and consistent policy and regulatory signals   to set the foundation for net-zero and shape the incentives for the transition. Increasing alignment and coordination across levels of government will only help to create an environment where taking risks and innovating are easier to do. None of these elements on their own are enough. We will need all components in place for us to succeed. You’ve likely heard the phrase, “there is no silver bullet.” It’s true. We probably need a Gatling gun. The good news is that many, if not most, of the key technology pathways we will need to achieve a low carbon future are already identified and known. One of the inputs that Emissions Reduction Alberta (ERA) is bringing to the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative is our  Technology Roadmap , a vision to help Alberta and Canada achieve this net-zero future and a key strategic document we use to guide our investments and project portfolio mix. It outlines key technology areas that will enable Alberta to build off its strengths and have a competitive economy that is contributing to a prosperous, lower emissions world. Some of the substantial decarbonization opportunities outlined in the Roadmap exist in the oil and gas industry. As it happens, there are already big investments bringing that to life. By exploring areas like partial upgrading, advanced recovery techniques, and carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), Alberta’s energy industry is working to get the carbon out of the barrel just as it got the sand out of the oil a generation before. Since the oil sands industry is the largest and fastest growing source of greenhouse gases in Alberta, this has the potential to make a significant impact. Now, we need to achieve an even more ambitious target — not just per-barrel intensity reductions, but overall emissions reductions. CCUS  not only plays a role in reducing emissions from existing industries, it also lays a foundation for exciting opportunities on the horizon that will create new economic activity, new jobs, and new industries and markets. It is integral to developing clean hydrogen which offers a solution to lower emissions in many hard-to-decarbonize sectors such as chemical manufacturing and heavy-duty transport. The  creation and storage of low-emitting electricity  is another opportunity to tap into some of Alberta’s existing hydrocarbon infrastructure, innovation, and expertise. From extracting lithium from its oil reservoirs to power the world’s growing fleet of electric vehicles, to taking advantage of Alberta’s existing expertise in drilling wells and applying it to the province’s best geothermal sites and producing energy from those old well sites. These are just chapters in the larger story for Alberta’s energy and emissions future. Innovation can be found everywhere.  Changes to land use practices and urban planning  can help sequester or minimize carbon emissions.  Support for the province’s bioenergy sector  can also deliver some quick and important wins for both the economy and the environment. Likewise, helping large emitters and heavy industry implement  energy efficient upgrades  and improve their operational processes is low-hanging fruit, ripe for the picking. ERA’s role is to help Alberta achieve its environmental and economic goals, and our participation in the EFPC will help us shape and learn more about the road ahead. We have shared our vision of what a successful future looks like, and our Technology Roadmap is how we can get there. Crucially for the collaborative, ERA can play an essential role in the de-risking and development of technologies that help both decarbonize Alberta’s existing economy and create technologies and pathways that are critical to the economic opportunities of the future. We need to cast a wide net. We must imagine, innovate, invent, and invest, across the board. Advances and successes in one sector can benefit and create space for progress in another. Transitioning to a clean energy future is complex and will take time. It requires the right policy signals and appropriate investments to support scaling-up promising technologies and adopting new ones that will help us take us another step toward creating the low carbon future the world is demanding. #Federal_Policy #Provincial_Policy #Sustainable_Finance #ERA_Technology_Roadmap #Culture_Shift #Regional_Pathways #CCUS #Batteries #Rooftop_Solar #Commercial_Solar #Commercial_Wind #Geothermal_Energy #Geothermal_From_Oil_Wells #Bio_Fuel #2021

Tech for Tomorrow’s Alberta: ERA’s Technology Roadmap & Future-Fit Hydrocarbons

Around the world, countries, corporations, and people are picking up the call for a net-zero future. This global rallying cry is highlighting that we need to do more to reach a lower emissions future and we need to do it at an exponential pace. We cannot close the gap between our reality today, and our aspirations for what is possible, without developing and deploying technologies that both manage our greenhouse gas emissions and add value to our economy. The transition to a lower emissions...

A shift towards a world with drastically lower carbon emissions appears to be in the cards. The UNFCC noted that  global commitments to reach net-zero emissions  from regions, cities, corporations, and countries has doubled since September 2019, and that was before China, Japan, and South Korea  all pledged  to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or 2060. This transition towards low carbon emission energy sources in global markets will utterly transform resource economies long-term. Canadian governments at all levels will not only need to think about diversification, but to act and invest ambitiously if they want to maintain current levels of economic prosperity in a changing world. However, they must undertake the difficult task of deciding which ideas are worth supporting in a world with a very uncertain future. For governments facing these decisions, a useful frame for thinking about change is through a “transition pathways lens”. As one of several lenses that the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative will be adopting, this blog provides a high-level of overview of what transition pathways are, how they can be considered, and how policymakers can think about selecting the “right” pathways to support the achievement of their outcomes. Pathways 101 Transition pathways are a concept used in academic and policy work to think about change through a systems lens. Pathways are, at their core, a framework for thinking about how change happens in economies. Transition pathways outline one or more “paths” that an economy, industry, or region can take to get from ‘Point A’ (the current states of things) to ‘Point B’ (a desired future state). The evolution of personal transportation from horse and cart to the internal combustion engine automobile is a historic example of a successful transition pathway. Battery-electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles have both emerged as potential pathways in the 21st century, although they have not yet displaced incumbents (and may not ultimately end up doing so). Pathways help outline the timing, scope, and scale of change necessary throughout the whole landscape for a region, industry, or economy to get from Point A to Point B. Importantly, this is not the same as a strategy: strategies are plans that outline how to get from A to B. Pathways help outline what needs to be considered, and what will matter, when assessing whether a given idea or concept is capable of getting us from A to B. Each pathway is made up of a combination of ideas and processes that shape the world we operate in. In the real world, change is influenced by a broad array of factors: technological process, social beliefs, economic ideology, mainstream cultural views, investment patterns, infrastructure networks, and more. Transition pathways are a useful framework for decision-makers because they can help outline how each of these ideas might influence the way change happens at a system-level, identifying what barriers or factors need to be considered or addressed when opting to pursue a particular goal. Change management Pathways are used to understand how interactions between different ideas create the landscape we operate in. This is important because the trajectory or direction of a given pathway will ultimately be shaped not by one idea, but by how that idea interacts with all other processes and beliefs held throughout the world. The difference between a good idea and a useful one is whether it works in practice; pathways help outline what is actually needed to help a particular idea achieve a desired outcome. Three concepts matter in discussions of pathways: the incumbent, the niche, and the landscape. “Incumbents” describe the ideas, groups, and processes that make up the status quo. They form the foundation of the world we live in today. To continue personal transportation as an example, incumbents would include oil companies who refine gasoline, networks of retail gas stations, and popular opinions about high-performance sports cars. They are the mainstream ideas, processes and beliefs that shape how we interact with technologies and each other. “Niches” describe innovative concepts and ideas whose success depends on upending or disrupting the status quo. In the case of personal transport, examples include electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla and Rivian, global pledges for net-zero emissions, and proponents of electrified transportation. These technologies and ideas are currently considered interesting and high-potential but can hardly claim to be the dominant technology in practice today. Yet they have the potential to eventually become incumbent ideas, depending on what kind of change the world experiences in the coming years. The “landscape” is a frame for thinking about how every set of actors, processes, groups and ideas ultimately makes the world the way it is. The landscape, or the world we live in, is shaped by interactions between incumbents and niches, since each aims to influence change in their favour. The trajectory of a pathway is defined by how these interactions take place, and that contest of ideas is what shapes the landscape we operate in globally. What is a “good” pathway? Identifying which pathways policymakers want to support depends on understanding what kind of future people want to live in. A “good” pathway is one that is capable of bringing about that future and can do so even if the world shifts around it. However, there are still some foundational characteristics that any pathway must possess to be seen as legitimate. At a minimum, good pathways must be: Credible:  Pathways must be based on the realities we live in. Effective pathways have to largely rely on ideas that are technically possible and used in practice, even if only at small-scale. Compelling:  Pathways must be attractive to investors and stakeholders. This means that designing pathways must keep in mind what investors are seeking in projects, and what the public will support, and incorporate those views into their approaches. Capable:  Pathways must possess the technical potential to actually achieve their objectives. This is most obvious in discussions of emissions mitigation. Any pathway compatible with a net-zero future must be technically capable of reaching a net-zero climate target, or it will not be able to achieve set objectives in practice. Flexible:  Pathways need to be able to change as circumstance does. The world moves quickly, and any pathway developed needs to be robust and flexible enough that it can swiftly adjust to new information without incurring huge losses or needing to be abandoned. Pathways are a useful frame for thinking about how change happens. As new and established ideas compete for market share and public attention in the decades to come, Canadian policymakers will need to ensure they are supporting the ideas that drive growth and regional prosperity. For the Energy Futures Policy Collaborative, thinking about how change happens is a useful way to ensure grounded, realistic decisions are made about what is required to build the future we want to live in. #Regional_Pathways #Culture_Shift #Provincial_Policy #Federal_Policy #2021

What is a Pathway? A conceptual overview of transition pathways

A shift towards a world with drastically lower carbon emissions appears to be in the cards. The UNFCC noted that  global commitments to reach net-zero emissions  from regions, cities, corporations, and countries has doubled since September 2019, and that was before China, Japan, and South Korea  all pledged  to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 or 2060. This transition towards low carbon emission energy sources in global markets will utterly transform resource economies long-term. Canadian...

As a second COVID wave hits the province with full force and the impacts of prolonged economic repercussions become clearer, Alberta faces challenges that will ask us to reimagine what it means to bring our ingenuity, expertise, and innovative spirit to bear. In a province already reimagining the future of its energy sector, COVID-19 has shocked demand and disrupted expectations we might have had about what the future could look like. This turbulence has been accompanied by an accelerated commitment among financial institutions to scrutinize their investment portfolios and other activity through a climate science lens. The UN Principles for Responsible Investment initiative, a leading body pushing towards low-carbon pathways, has  reported that signatories have more than $100 trillion in assets under management , and  the Bank of Canada has made recent public statements  about how we will need to decarbonize many facets of our lives in order to mitigate the worst impacts of climate change. Global investors are demanding a more stringent reckoning with an emerging consensus that prioritizes climate risk. With all of this as backdrop, several leading oil and gas companies have  reduced the reported value of their assets by more than $80 billion in the first three quarters of 2020 . The climate-concerned investment trends are frequently presented as a problem for Alberta, but they could be an opportunity instead. The flip side of having high per-capita and per-barrel emissions is that Alberta has major emissions reduction potential. It means we should be a big market for the developers of clean technology solutions. Combine that with a strong history of innovation in carbon management and the potential for new ‘future-fit’ hydrocarbon feedstocks, and Alberta should have considerable opportunities to access the capital looking to finance the transition to a low-carbon emissions economy. What’s been holding us back? First, a view that the past must be entirely left in the past, abandoning existing skills, infrastructure, and resources in pursuit of a net-new future vision. Perfect can be the enemy of good, and the prospect of stranded assets creates real uncertainty at every level of society. Second, however, is uncertainty about where the terrain of global energy systems and markets may shift to and at what pace, combined with an inability to collectively acknowledge the reality that the “good old days” may not return. Taken together, overcoming these challenges require us to look to the future while also building on the rich legacy of Alberta’s communities and the enterprises they have built. It is in this middle space of transition there is an important role for policymakers to play. Even as there is some crystallization around what should be left in the unsustainable past and what we might aim for in a low-carbon emissions future, in between there is a deep need for transition solutions, especially for resource-rich jurisdictions. Policymakers will be crucial in holding the space for better visions to evolve and attract supporters, in fostering sectoral responses, in creating the conditions for social and technological innovation to thrive, and in sending policy signals that are durable, credible, and on the scale of the challenges we face. The Energy Futures Policy Collaborative (EFPC) , an initiative of the Max Bell Foundation and the Energy Futures Lab, also involving the Canada West Foundation, Smart Prosperity Institute, Business Council of Alberta, and Emissions Reduction Alberta, aims to identify and support these possible responses. It will explore the question: How we might use public policy to help attract greater investment and talent into the innovation and infrastructure for ‘future-fit’ hydrocarbons, in light of global investors’ increasing concern with climate change and growing appetite for low-emissions and transition-oriented opportunities . The EFPC will unfold over the course of two years, casting a wide net and engaging more than just the usual suspects. This broad lens may seem perplexing to stakeholders on all sides of the convening question, who may have a laundry list of specific challenges and a portfolio of preferred solutions. It is essential, however, that we don’t zoom in too quickly. By keeping our frame broad, we aim to: Push ourselves to investigate the problem space from different perspectives, surfacing assumptions and asking better questions that open up new possibilities for solutions, Map the landscape of existing initiatives, projects, and thinking, enabling us to anchor in potent policy windows and to be additive and complementary to work quickly coming online Take a systems approach, recognizing the fact that no single actor or solution can move the needle alone and building towards a portfolio of possible solutions designed to amplify opportunities and anticipate unintended consequences. Though our process will be systematic and structured, the journey we’ll be undertaking to explore this question will not be a linear one. A developmental approach will provide the team with real time feedback on what’s working and what’s not working, in addition to raising the question of whether our work is making a difference. This policy collaborative is also taking a new approach by building time into the process to conduct small scale testing. Lastly, while the process primarily targets policy recommendations as its key deliverables, it has been designed in such a way that it offers the possibility that potential solutions and initiatives could also emerge that are not policy-focused or targeted at governments (e.g. new partnerships, projects, public engagement activities, products/services). The Energy Futures Lab is well set up as a platform to connect such additional initiatives to further testing and development through its extensive network and existing partnerships. The importance of this project being a collaborative that aims to harness the power of diverse perspectives cannot be understated. A multidimensional challenge such as this requires a multidimensional approach, one that taps into a broader and deeper variety of expertise, people, and lived experiences. Crucially, this is an opportunity to demonstrate to climate-concerned investors that there is a broader network of Alberta innovators and professionals working to bridge the gap between where Alberta’s energy sector currently sits in relation to climate change responses, and where it needs to sit for investors to feel confident investing in Alberta hydrocarbon resources, technologies, and skills. As we set off on this initiative, there’s a palpable sense, in all corners, that the status quo can’t continue, with as many root causes and possible solutions as there are stakeholders. Our aspiration is to help policy leaders respond to and map pathways in this dynamic environment, and ultimately to play a role in helping attract climate-concerned investment capital into the innovations and infrastructure that will position Alberta for success in the 21st century. #Clean_Technologies #Regional_Pathways #Sustainable_Finance #Scenarios_for_Albertas_Energy_Future #Prosperous_Transition_Blueprint_and_Campaign #Energy_Futures_Policy_Collaborative #FutureFit_Hydrocarbons #FutureFit_Hydrocarbons #Sustainable_Finance_Transition_Index #2020

Building a Policy Bridge to Future-Fit Hydrocarbons

As a second COVID wave hits the province with full force and the impacts of prolonged economic repercussions become clearer, Alberta faces challenges that will ask us to reimagine what it means to bring our ingenuity, expertise, and innovative spirit to bear. In a province already reimagining the future of its energy sector, COVID-19 has shocked demand and disrupted expectations we might have had about what the future could look like. This turbulence has been accompanied by an accelerated...

Energy Futures Lab Logo White

We gratefully acknowledge the original territories of the Siksikáwa, Îyârhe Nakodabi, and Tsuut’ina Dene, of Mohkínstsisakápiyoyis, Wincheesh-pah, Kootsisáw, or the colonized lands which many now refer to as Calgary, where the Energy Futures Lab is headquartered. These Lands are also home to members of the Métis Nation of Alberta under the Otipemisiwak Métis Government — District 4 & 5, whose peoples have deep relationships with the land. This reminds all of us to walk in a good way and remember our commitments to Indigenous Peoples.

Get in Touch

Subscribe

Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on all the latest news and events

About Us

 

The Energy Futures Lab is a platform for shaping the people-powered solutions to Canada's most complex energy challenges.

bottom of page